Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2021  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 25--32

An Assessment of Health Information Resource Center and Supportive Program Needs


Gek Phin Chua1, Quan Sing Ng2,  
1 Cancer Education and Information Service (Research and Data), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
2 Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence Address:
MN, RN Gek Phin Chua
Cancer Education and Information Service (Research and Data), National Cancer Centre Singapore
Singapore

Abstract

Objective: No practical method or assessment tool for identifying patients' and their families' health information resource needs in a resource center exists. We sought to assess the health information and resource preferences of patients and their families to guide the planning of a health information resource center (HIRC). Methods: A needs assessment was conducted using convenience sample of patients and families drawn from the National Cancer Centre in Singapore. A survey was conducted to gather data from April 23, 2018, to May 11, 2018, at the Specialist Oncology Clinics (SOCs) and the Ambulatory Treatment Unit. Results: A total of 778 surveys were analyzed, and the majority of the respondents were Chinese (79.8%). There were 449 (57.7%) patients and 317 (40.7%) family members. Among the 778 respondents, the overall top item chosen for facilities, resources, and equipment were a quiet and comfortable area for reading and reflection (77.2%), information about education and support services offered by the center (71.6%), and computers with internet access (63.6%), respectively. The overall top three services needed in the resource center were advice on useful resources (70.6%); announcements on newly received materials, programs, and support services (64.8%); and resource personnel to assist with identifying materials/navigating through resources (53.2%). Written education pamphlets/brochures were rated as the most useful material (74.6%), followed by consumer health books (74.2%) and newsletter (59.6%). The top overall three supportive programs required were nutrition talks and cooking demonstrations (76.7%), counseling (individual, couples, family, and bereavement) (74.3%), and exercise (e.g., Tai Chi, yoga) (68.5%). Conclusions: The findings obtained from this assessment provide guidance to the development of a user-friendly, patient- and family-centric HIRC.



How to cite this article:
Chua GP, Ng QS. An Assessment of Health Information Resource Center and Supportive Program Needs.Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2021;8:25-32


How to cite this URL:
Chua GP, Ng QS. An Assessment of Health Information Resource Center and Supportive Program Needs. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs [serial online] 2021 [cited 2020 Dec 4 ];8:25-32
Available from: https://www.apjon.org/text.asp?2021/8/1/25/299880


Full Text



 Introduction



Cancer and its treatment is a very traumatic event affecting not only the patients but also their caregivers. The nature of the disease requires patients to learn about the illness, make difficult decisions regarding the ensuing treatment, and cope with the consequences of the illness. For caregivers, information is needed to provide physical, emotional, social, financial, and spiritual support to the cancer patients and help them manage their own physical and emotional needs.

Studies have revealed that cancer patients have a considerable amount of informational needs, and these needs vary from patients to patients, gender, age, and type and stage of disease.[1],[2] Information needs include illness/disease[3],[4],[5],[6] and treatment;[3],[4],[5] likelihood of cure/prognosis; spread of disease;[3] recurrence and survival outcomes;[4] and side effects;[5],[6] including financial concerns.[7],[8] Similarly, research studies have also shown that patient caregivers had a considerable need for information and support as they are becoming more responsible for providing physical and psychosocial care over long period.[9],[10]

However, literature consistently identifies gaps in information delivery; patients and their caregivers have to resort to other information sources to seek information, and the prevalence of information seeking does not diminish over time.[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16] Concerns were also raised about the difficulty in obtaining the information they needed, difficulty in comprehending the information obtained,[17],[18],[19] causing confusion,[20] conflicting information and unreliable sources[18],[21] and the quality of information obtained[11],[15],[16] besides being a time-consuming process.[21]

Lack of information puts both patients and caregivers at risk for negative consequences such as distress[9],[22],[23],[24] and increased burden.[9] Conversely, well-informed patients and caregivers have been reported to have reduced anxiety and increased sense of control, better coping, increased satisfaction with treatment, and improved communication with family.[25] In order to help them make informed medical decisions and cope with the physical and psychological problems associated with cancer and its treatment, it is important to assess their information and supportive care needs. Failure to identify the information and supportive care needs of the patients and their families may result in spending an inordinate amount of time and resources attempting to deliver information and supportive care that may not be needed by them, resulting in the ineffective use of finite resource.

Health information resource center (HIRC) has an important role to play in improving access to health-related information by patients and their families. Careful planning is important to ensure that the resource center will serve a useful purpose. An understanding of stakeholders' information needs and resource preferences is crucial to guide care planning so that finite resources can then be directed toward developing the needed resources and support programs to supplement the consultation visits and provide support for both patients and family members.

The goal of this assessment was to facilitate the development of a patient- and family-centric HIRC in the new National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) based on the actual needs of users. Specially, the assessment aims:

To create an environment that is conducive for learningTo establish the type of relevant and accessible collection of resourceTo identify the type and range of services neededTo determine the supportive care needs of the patients and family.

 Methods



This assessment employed survey as an evaluation method in order to gather a large number of stakeholders to obtain information about their needs and preferences about the facilities and resources for the planning of a HIRC. The survey was conducted from April 23, 2018, to May 11, 2018, at the SOCs and the Ambulatory Treatment Unit of the NCCS. Anyone who attended NCCS (patient/family member/accompanying personnel) and able to read and write in English or Chinese during the survey period were invited to participate in the self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire included an open-ended question to ascertain the type of information needed. The questionnaire was developed based on information obtained from the “Resource Centre Manual: How to set up and manage a resource centre[26] and prior identified needs of patients and caregivers in the Centre.”[15],[27],[28] Ethical approval for this evaluation was not obtained because no sensitive or identifiable data of participants were obtained, and it also posed no foreseeable risk/harm to participants in this quality initiative to enhance the delivery of patient- and family-centric care.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the quantitative data collected in the survey. Categorical variables were reported using frequent counts and percentages. Data were analyzed for the entire cohort of respondents, and by identity of the respondents (i.e., patient, family, or others). Responses in the open-ended question were grouped into categories for reporting purpose.

 Results



Demographics

A total of 778 respondents was analyzed. Majority of the respondents were patients (57.7%) and Chinese (79.8%) [Table 1].{Table 1}

Patient and family education resource center

Facilities/resources/equipment

Among the 778 respondents, the overall top item chosen for facilities, resources, and equipment were a quiet and comfortable area for reading and reflection (77.2%), information about education and support services offered by the center (71.6%), and computer with Internet access (63.6%), respectively. The results were almost similar across the patients and family members except that the family members preferred to have Internet access (79.8%) than a quiet and comfortable area for reading and reflection (73.8%) [Table 2].{Table 2}

Services needed

Among the 778 respondents, the overall top three services needed in the resource center were advice on useful resources (70.6%); announcements on newly received materials, programs, and support services (64.8%); and resource personnel to assist with identifying materials/navigating through resources (53.2%). The results were consistent with the patients, whereas the family members preferred to have resource lists (49.8%) over having a resource personnel to assist with identifying materials/navigating through resources (46.1%) [Table 3].{Table 3}

Information materials

Among the 778 respondents who rated the materials as useful or very useful, written education pamphlets/brochures were rated as the most useful material (74.6%), followed by consumer health books (74.2%) and newsletter (59.6%) [Figure 1].{Figure 1}

Type of information needed

The top three types of information needed by respondents were cancer, treatment, and diet and nutrition. Healthy living, drugs/clinical trials, and survivorship are currently not their focus [Table 4].{Table 4}

Language

Among the 778 respondents, 82.8% wanted the materials to be in English and 54.9% wanted the materials to be in Chinese [Table 5].{Table 5}

Support programs

Among the 778 respondents, the top overall three programs wanted were nutrition talks and cooking demonstrations (76.7%), counseling (individual, couples, family, and bereavement) (74.3%), and exercise (e.g., Tai Chi, yoga) (68.5%). Patients rated similarly as the overall cohort, whereas the caregivers preferred to have caregiver support (70.7%) over exercise (67.2%) [Table 6].{Table 6}

 Discussion



A HIRC plays a very important role in the continuum of information provision. In order to encourage patients and family members to come to the resource center, it must be equipped with good facilities/resources based on their needs. Needs assessment is a process of directly assessing and identifying specific issues of need of patients, and they are crucial to guide care planning.[29]

Facilities and resource needs

Overall, patients and family members wanted a “quiet and comfortable area for reading and reflection.” Learning depends on several factors, but the environment plays an important role. Noise can be highly distracting. A distraction-free environment facilitates concentration, resulting in the ability to learn information more quickly and effectively. Besides being distraction free, comfort is also important. Adequate lighting, a cool environment, and comfortable chairs are important for relaxation and good posture. A quiet and comfortable area can play a key role in helping patients and family members concentrate in the most effective way possible. In addition, overall 74.8% of the patients and their family members required Internet access to be available at the resource center including computers with Internet access.

The advent and the rapid growth and development of information technology bring easy access to health-related information. Although 91% of the household have Internet access in Singapore,[30] it is not unexpected that computers with Internet access topped the overall equipment needs. Literature indicates that cancer patients and their caregivers have many information needs[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[27] and are active online information seekers[13],[14],[15] due to its convenience, the amount of information available, immediacy of access,[12],[31] and privacy and anonymity.[31] However, concerns were raised regarding the quality and quantity of information and its credibility and impact on patients' well-being and decision-making.[21],[32] In addition, negative feelings, such as confusion or nervousness/anxiety, were also reported.[20],[21] As there is no regulatory oversight on the posting of medical and health information on the Internet, the information posted may be incomplete, inaccurate, inappropriate, or erroneous.[18],[21],[31] Although there is little evidence that much harm has been done, there was a reported case of death directly reported from misinformation from the Internet.[31] As information on the Internet can vary widely in quality and there is the potential risk of misinformation and confusion, patients and their families also need advice on useful resources (identified as top resource needs by both patients and families) and assistance with identifying materials/navigating through resources (identified as top three service needs) including information on useful web links to high-quality and reliable health-related information websites based on their needs and assistance in accessing them.

Health information needs

Information needs about cancer and treatment topped the types of information needed. The importance of such information is well reported in the literature.[3],[4],[5],[6] Information about the disease and its treatments and potential outcomes is important in decision-making regarding the ensuing treatment and coping with the consequences of the illness and treatment, both physically and emotionally and to be an active participant in the care process.

Overall, 74.6% rated written educational materials/brochures as useful/very useful. The preference for written information materials is supported by literature.[13],[15],[20],[33],[34] The benefits of written education materials/brochures are the ability for learners to control their own rate of learning, the order in which they choose to pay attention to information, and they are easy to physically carry and interact with as needed without the necessity of further equipment.[35] A systematic review by Sherlock and Brownie[36] found that patients' recollection and understanding of the medical procedure, risks, and complications is often low, particularly among older individuals and the use of education materials delivered in written form or embedded in an interactive multimedia process led to improvements in patients' understanding. However, written information materials may be ineffective unless they are written based on health and language literacy.[37] As English (82.8%) and Chinese (54.9%) languages and almost 75% of Singaporeans are Chinese,[38] this provides impetus for the need to provide information materials are not only in English but also in the Chinese language.

Supportive programs needs

Nutrition talks and cooking demonstration topped the list of support services desired by both patients and family members (76.7%). The need for dietary information and advice has been well reported in the literature.[27],[39],[40] Cancer and its treatment such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy can cause many side effects such as mucositis, alteration in taste, dyspepsia, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation[41],[42],[43] and adversely affect the nutritional intake and compromise the general health of the patients. Restrictions of specific foods in children (<18 years old) undergoing cancer treatment was practiced by 57% of mothers and misconceptions regarding diet are prevalent.[44] Food avoidance is very prevalent in the Asian, especially the Chinese. The Chinese believed that the body is kept in the harmony (Yin and Yang) by the type of food that one eats. It can also be either more Yin or more Yang depending on the methods used in cooking. There are also many foods that are considered taboo when a patient has a diagnosis of cancer. These beliefs can include that patients should avoid protein from animal sources, such as chicken, pork, eggs, seafood, not drinking milk, and not eating sugar.[45] This is supported by studies[46],[47] that the majority of patients reported a reduction in the consumption of red meat, seafood, and poultry. As good nutrition is important in recovery and literature indicates a lack of basic information and dietary advices, this is an area that will probably be well received by many patients and family members.

Limitations

Sampling by convenience limits the generalizability of these findings and the questionnaire was only available in English and Chinese, therefore, a limitation of this assessment was that participants had to be proficient in English or Chinese. However, English is our first language and there were representations from other races in this assessment. In addition, the assessment was conducted using a nonvalidated questionnaire. Nevertheless, we were able to gather a large sample of both patients and family members to provide the needed data to assist us in our planning of our HIRC.

 Conclusions



HIRC plays a very important role in the continuum of information provision by improving access to health-related information to patients and families. Careful planning is important to ensure that the HIRC will serve its useful purpose in meeting this important need. This assessment has identified the facilities, resources, and supportive care needs of patients and families. We hope that the assessment will help guide the development of a patient- and family-centric HIRC. Our findings would also help health-care professionals to better understand the support programs desired by patients and families so that finite resources can then be directed toward developing the needed support for them. To ensure that the HIRC and support programs remain relevant and patient and family centric, it is important to monitor and assess its performance and service needs continuously.

Acknowledgments

The authors would also like to acknowledge the time and effort taken by the volunteers, patients, and their family members who participated in this survey; the authors greatly appreciate their involvement, as without their participation this survey would not be possible.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Davison BJ, Breckon EN. Impact of health information-seeking behavior and personal factors on preferred role in treatment decision making in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs 2012;35:411-8.
2Bernstein KI, Promislow S, Carr R, Rawsthorne P, Walker JR, Bernstein CN. Information needs and preferences of recently diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17:590-8.
3Li PW, So WK, Fong DY, Lui LY, Lo JC, Lau SF. The information needs of breast cancer patients in Hong Kong and their levels of satisfaction with the provision of information. Cancer Nurs 2011;34:49-57.
4Lo AC, Olson R, Feldman-Stewart D, Truong PT, Aquino-Parsons C, Bottorff JL, et al. A patient-centered approach to evaluate the information needs of women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Clin Oncol 2017;40:574-81.
5Maddock C, Lewis I, Ahmad K, Sullivan R. Online information needs of cancer patients and their organizations. Ecancermedicalscience 2011;5:235.
6Lambert SD, Loiselle CG, Macdonald ME. An in-depth exploration of information-seeking behaviour among individuals with cancer – Part 1: Understanding differential patterns of active information seeking. Cancer Nurs 2009;32:11-23.
7Veenstra CM, Regenbogen SE, Hawley ST, Griggs JJ, Banerjee M, Kato I, et al. A composite measure of personal financial burden among patients with stage III colorectal cancer. Med Care 2014;52:957-62.
8Sherwood PR, Donovan HS, Rosenzweig M, Hamilton R, Bender CM. A house of cards: The impact of treatment costs on women with breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Nurs 2008;31:470-7.
9Sklenarova H, Krümpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, et al. When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 2015;121:1513-9.
10Doubova SV, Aguirre-Hernandez R, Infante-Castañeda C, Martinez-Vega I, Pérez-Cuevas R. Needs of caregivers of cancer patients: Validation of the Mexican version of the Support Person Unmet Needs Survey (SPUNS-SFM). Support Care Cancer 2015;23:2925-35.
11Hesse BW, Arora NK, Beckjord EB, Rutten LJ. Information support for cancer survivors. Cancer Suppl 2008;112:2529-40.
12Mayer DK, Terrin NC, Kreps GL, Menon U, McCance K, Parsons SK, et al. Cancer survivors information seeking behaviours: A comparison of survivors who do and do not seek information about cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2007;65:342-350.
13Shea-Budgell MA, Kostaras X, Myhill KP, Hagen NA. Information needs and sources of information for patients during cancer follow-up. Curr Oncol 2014;21:165-73.
14Longacre ML. Cancer caregivers information needs and resource preferences. J Cancer Educ 2013;28:297-305.
15Chua GP, Tan HK, Gandhi M. Information sources and online information seeking behaviours of cancer patients in Singapore. Ecancermedicalscience 2018;12:880.
16Chua GP, Ng QS, Tan HK, Ong WS. Caregivers of cancer patients: What are their information seeking behaviours and resource preference? Ecancermedicalscience 2020;14:1068.
17Roach AR, Lykins EL, Gochett CG, Brechting EH, Graue LO, Andrykowski MA. Differences in cancer information seeking behaviour, preferences and awareness between cancer survivors and healthy controls: A national, population-based survey. J Cancer Educ 2009;24:73-9.
18Zilinski L. Information behaviours of cancer patients in the information age. Lib Stud J 2010. Available from: https://imsva91-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https%3a%2f%2fpdfs.semanticscholar.org%2f0653%2fbc1bebaf79fbf51832ce09e6aedb6dfe866b.pdf&umid=12C2E070-7489-C305-88CD-85ADBB749CF&auth=6e3fe59570831a389716849e93b5d483c90c3fe4-. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 05].
19Sommerhalder K, Abraham A, Zufferey MC, Barth J, Abel T. Internet information and medical consultations: Experiences from patients' and physicians' perspectives. Patient Educ Couns 2009;77:266-71.
20Lopez-Gomez M, Ortega C, Suarez I, Serralta G, Madero R, Gomez-Raposo C, et al. Internet use by cancer patients: Should oncologists 'prescribe' accurate web sites in combination with chemotherapy? A survey in a Spanish cohort. Ann Oncol 2012;23:1579-85.
21Silver MP. Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: A qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e19.
22van Ryan M, Sanders S, Kahn K, van Houtven C, Griffin JM, Martin M, et al. Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: A hidden quality issue? Psycho Oncol 2011;20:44-52.
23Lopez V, Copp G, Molassiotis A. Male caregivers of patients with breast and gynecologic cancer: Experiences from caring for their spouses and partners. Cancer Nurs 2012;35:402-10.
24Rhee YS, Yun YH, Park S, Shin DO, Lee KM, Yoo HJ, et al. Depression in family caregivers of cancer patients: The feeling of burden as a predictor of depression. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5890-5.
25Given BA, Given CW, Sherwood P. The challenge of quality cancer care for family caregivers. Semin Oncol Nurs 2012;28:205-12.
26O'Sullivan S, Dutton S. Resource Centre Manual: How to Set Up and Manage a Resource Centre. London, UK: Healthlink Worldwide; 2003.
27Chua GP, Tan HK, Gandhi M. What information do cancer patients want and how well are their needs being met? Ecancermedicalscience 2018;12:873.
28Chua GP, Tan HK. A qualitative approach in determining the patient-centered information and supportive care needs of cancer patients in Singapore. BMJ Open 2020;10:e034178.
29Miyashita M, Ohno S, Kataoka A, Tokunaga E, Masuda N, Shien T, et al. Unmet information needs and quality of life in young breast cancer survivors in Japan. Cancer Nurs 2015;38:E1-11.
30Infocomm Media Development Authority. Infocomm Usage – Households and Individuals. Infocomm Media Development Authority; 2020. Available from: https://www2.imda.gov.sg/infocomm-media-landscape/research-and-statistics/infocomm-usage-households-and-individual. [Last accessed on 2020 Feb 07].
31Huang GJ, Penson DF. Internet health resources and the cancer patient. Cancer Invest 2008;26:202-7.
32Ahmad F, Hudak PL, Bercovitz K, Hollenberg E, Levinson W. Are physicians ready for patients with Internet-based health information? J Med Internet Res 2006;8:e22.
33Chen SC. Information needs and information sources of family caregivers of cancer patients. Aslib J Inf 2014;66:623-39.
34Papadakos J, Bussiere-Cote S, Abdelmutti N, Catton P, Friedman AJ, Massey C, et al. Information needs of gynecological cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:452-7.
35Wilson EA, Makoul G, Bojarski EA, Bailey SC, Waite KR, Rapp DN, et al. Comparative analysis of print and multimedia health materials: A review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2012;89:7-14.
36Sherlock A, Brownie S. Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: A literature review. ANZ J Surg 2014;84:207-10.
37Protheroe J, Estacio EV, Saidy-Khan S. Patient information materials in general practices and promotion of health literacy: An observational study of their effectiveness. Br J Gen Pract 2015;65:e192-7.
38Department of Statistics Singapore. Singapore Residents by Age Group, Ethnic Group and Sex. Department of Statistics Singapore; 2020. Available from: https://www.tablebuilder.singstat.gov.sg/publicfacing/createDataTable.action?refld=14911. [Last accessed on 2020 Feb 07].
39Beeken RJ, Williams K, Wardle J, Croker H. “What about diet” A qualitative study of cancer survivors' views on diet and cancer and their sources of information. Euro J Cancer Care 2016;25:774-83.
40Chua GP, Ng QS, Tan HK, Ong WS. Cancer survivors: What are their information seeking behaviours? J Cancer Educ 2020 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01756-8. Online ahead of print.
41Pearce A, Haas M, Viney R, Pearson SA, Haywood P, Brown C, et al. Incidence and severity of self-reported chemotherapy side effects in routine care: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0184360.
42Chan HK, Ismail S. Side effects of chemotherapy among cancer patients in a Malaysian General Hospital: Experiences, perceptions and information needs from clinical pharmacists. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:5305-9.
43Marinho ED, Custódio ID, Ferreira IB, Crispim CA, Paiva CE, Maia YC. Impact of chemotherapy on perceptions related to food intake in women with breast cancer: A prospective study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0187573.
44Totadri S, Radhakrishnan V, Atreya H, Shenoy PK, Ganesan P, Ganesan TS, et al. Dietary perceptions and beliefs among families with children undergoing therapy for cancer. Pediatr Hematol Oncol J 2017;2:25-8.
45Tan SC. Science vs. myths: Battling with the big C with food. The Star Online; 2014. Available from: http://www.thestar.com.my/lifestyle/health/2014/07/13/food-forthought/. [Last accessed on 2020 Feb 07].
46Shaharudin SH, Sulaiman S, Shahril MR, Emran NA, Akmal SN. Dietary changes among breast cancer patients in Malaysia. Cancer Nurs 2013;36:131-8.
47Yung TK, Kim JH, Leung SF, Yeung RM, Poon AN, Au EW, et al. Food avoidance beliefs and behaviours among Chinese cancer patients: Validation of a new measurement tool. J Nutr Educ Behav 2019;51:162-72.