EDITORIAL

Year : 2017  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 187-190

Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on retinoblastoma management

Bhavna Chawla¹, Kiran Kumar¹, Arun D Singh MD ^2
1 Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, New Delhi; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
² Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, The Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH; Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

Correspondence Address:
Arun D Singh
Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, The Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
USA

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Check

4

DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_19_17

Socioeconomic Factors

1. Due to economic constraints, parents from low socioeconomic strata are unable to travel to a specialized center in the early stages of disease, resulting in disease progression, with resultant worsening prognosis
2. Appropriate treatment may not be accessible due to scarcity of human resources, unavailability of appropriate diagnostic skills and instrumentation, essential medication, and lack of support from government and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)
3. Prolonged treatment protocols that require lengthy stay away from home are another deterrent. Registry-based studies have shown that survival after childhood cancer depends on the resources of the families. The presence of siblings may affect patient care as parents can devote less time in assisting a sick child and there is also less to spend on each child, thereby increasing the chances of comorbidities before and after diagnosis ^[7],[8]
4. Few specialized centers have the facility for treatment and these are also located only in the big cities, away from rural areas and smaller towns
5. Socioeconomic status also has an influence on the level of education. Parents with a lower status have limited information regarding the signs and symptoms of RB. Parents often state that even though they noted an abnormality in the eye, most often the white reflex, they did not relate this to the possibility of having a life-threatening disease. On the other hand, parents with a higher educational level have a better level of overall health literacy and awareness
6. Comorbidities are more prevalent in children from lower socioeconomic strata due to lack of immunization, respiratory infections, malnutrition, and other factors that further compromise the overall survival rate.

Cultural Beliefs

1. Due to advanced disease at presentation, enucleation is the most commonly offered treatment. Often, it is not accepted due to unfounded fear of cosmetic disfigurement. This is especially true for a female child, where the cosmetic disability may hinder marital prospects
2. Alternative systems of medicine such as Ayurveda and Homeopathy are quite popular and on many occasions, they are preferred over the cosmetically disfiguring surgery of enucleation
3. Gender-preferential treatment – If the affected child is a male, the family is more willing to borrow for travel and treatment. On the other hand, the female child is often a victim of neglect. Although there is no gender predilection for development of RB, in a recently published study from our center, 60% of children were males, suggesting that parents are more likely to seek tertiary care services for boys than for girls
4. Case studies of defaulters from our center who later progressed to more advanced disease suggest that socioeconomic and/or cultural factors served as deterrents in following medical advice [Table 1].

Table  1: Specific case studies of defaulters due to socioeconomic and/or cultural factors Click here to view

Overcoming the Barriers

1. Funding support: As the largest tertiary care referral center in India, 250–300 cases of RB are diagnosed every year. The majority of our patients are from low socioeconomic strata and rural background, reflecting the overall population demographics. The majority travel large distances for treatment. With the help of support from governmental agencies and NGOs, we have developed a model that enables free of cost treatment to the poor patients. This includes surgery, hospital stay, focal therapy, chemotherapy, and investigations. In addition, travel and logistics support are also provided. Due to efforts in this direction, the compliance toward treatment has improved drastically and abandonment rates have dropped significantly
2. Multidisciplinary team: Treatment of RB requires close coordination between several disciplines of medicine. A team of specialists consisting of ocular oncologist, pediatric oncologist, radiation oncologist, anesthetist, radiologist, pathologist, geneticist, and nurses works together so that the desired treatment is completed under one roof. This also helps improve patient compliance and reduces the cost
3. Counseling: Proper counseling plays a very important role in overcoming these barriers. Counseling of parents about the nature of the disease, importance of early treatment, available treatment options, morbidity associated with the treatment which may include visual impairment and cosmetic deformity secondary to enucleation or irradiation of the orbital region, and the need for regular follow-up is important. Nursing staff and social workers play an important role in counseling the patients and motivating them. At our center, we have a dedicated social worker and staff nurse for patients with RB who track patient's follow-up by contacting the families by phone before appointment and if they do not return for their scheduled appointment. This has resulted in a significant decrease in dropouts after initiation of treatment.^[13]

What More Can Be Done?

1. RB has a definite recognizable early stage, where focal therapy and/or chemotherapy alone suffice. Sensitizing ophthalmologists and pediatricians toward detection of this vital sign must be undertaken. Linking the “red reflex test” with the national immunization program can go a long way in screening children and identifying them
2. A nationwide awareness campaign to educate the public and healthcare professionals about early signs of RB is required.^[13] Early detection of RB and appropriate referral to specialized centers will help in proper treatment and follow-up of these cases
3. The use of telemedicine for continuing education and consultation ^[14]
4. Identification of a modern center that could mentor other centers using a twinning model, wherein there is a direct and continuous interaction between peripheral hospitals and a specialized center through education, training, and telemedicine ^[15]
5. Improving the infrastructure and imparting specific training to postgraduate doctors and primary physicians ^[16]
6. Global initiatives by NGOs such as the International Network for Cancer Treatment and Research, Orbis International, and the International Agency for Prevention of Blindness should be encouraged
7. Creation of facilities for diagnosing and treating RB at the primary and secondary levels of health care can help reduce mortality and morbidity.^[7]

Summary

References

1.	Shields CL, Shields JA. Diagnosis and management of retinoblastoma. Cancer Control 2004;11:317-27.   [PUBMED]
2.	Abramson DH. Retinoblastoma incidence in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:1514.   [PUBMED]
3.	Cancer Facts and Figures. Special Section: Cancer in Children and Adolescents. American Cancer Society. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/webcontent/acspc-041787.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Sep 12].
4.	Age-adjusted and Age-specific SEER Cancer Incidence Rates, 2004-2008. Available from: http://www.seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2008/results_merged/sect_29_childhood_cancer_iccc.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Sep 12].
5.	Yeole BB, Advani S. Retinoblastoma: An epidemiological appraisal with reference to a population in Mumbai, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2002;3:17-21.   [PUBMED]
6.	National Guidelines in the Management of Retinoblastoma. New Delhi: Published by Indian Council of Medical Research; 2010. p. 2.
7.	Wilson JM, Jungner G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Public Health Papers, No. 34. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1968. Available from: http://www.whqlibdoc.who.int/php/WHO_PHP_34.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Sep 12].
8.	Howard SC, Pedrosa M, Lins M, Pedrosa A, Pui CH, Ribeiro RC, et al. Establishment of a pediatric oncology program and outcomes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a resource-poor area. JAMA 2004;291:2471-5.   [PUBMED]
9.	Du XL, Lin CC, Johnson NJ, Altekruse S. Effects of individual-level socioeconomic factors on racial disparities in cancer treatment and survival: Findings from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study, 1979-2003. Cancer 2011;117:3242-51.   [PUBMED]
10.	Patterson JM, Holm KE, Gurney JG. The impact of childhood cancer on the family: A qualitative analysis of strains, resources, and coping behaviors. Psychooncology 2004;13:390-407.   [PUBMED]
11.	Leal-Leal C, Flores-Rojo M, Medina-Sansón A, Cerecedo-Díaz F, Sánchez-Félix S, González-Ramella O, et al. A  multicentre report from the Mexican Retinoblastoma Group. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1074-7.
12.	Howard SC, Marinoni M, Castillo L, Bonilla M, Tognoni G, Luna-Fineman S, et al. Improving outcomes for children with cancer in low-income countries in Latin America: A report on the recent meetings of the Monza International School of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (MISPHO)-Part I. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;48:364-9.   [PUBMED]
13.	Chawla B, Hasan F, Azad R, Seth R, Upadhyay AD, Pathy S, et al. Clinical presentation and survival of retinoblastoma in Indian children. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100:172-8.   [PUBMED]
14.	Qaddoumi I, Mansour A, Musharbash A, Drake J, Swaidan M, Tihan T, et al. Impact of telemedicine on pediatric neuro-oncology in a developing country: The Jordanian-Canadian experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;48:39-43.   [PUBMED]
15.	Qaddoumi I, Nawaiseh I, Mehyar M, Razzouk B, Haik BG, Kharma S, et al. Team management, twinning, and telemedicine in retinoblastoma: A 3-tier approach implemented in the first eye salvage program in Jordan. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;51:241-4.   [PUBMED]
16.	Ribeiro Kde C, Antoneli CB. Trends in eye cancer mortality among children in Brazil, 1980-2002. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;48:296-305.   [PUBMED]

Authors

This article has been cited by 1 Role of ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) in the presentation of retinoblastoma: findings from the UK Rabia Bourkiza,Phillippa Cumberland,Ido Didi Fabian,Hiranya Abeysekera,Manoj Parulekar,Mandeep S Sagoo,Jugnoo Rahi,M Ashwin Reddy BMJ Open Ophthalmology. 2020; 5(1): e000415 [Pubmed] | [DOI] 2 Socioeconomic status and retinoblastoma survival: Experience of a tertiary cancer center in Brazil Clarissa Mattosinho,Anna Tereza Moura,Nathalia Grigorovski,Luiz Henrique Araújo,Sima Ferman,Karina Ribeiro Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2020; [Pubmed] | [DOI] 3 Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Retinoblastoma Enucleation: A Population-Based Study, SEER 18 2000-2014 Nitya Rajeshuni,Alice S. Whittemore,Cassie A. Ludwig,Prithvi Mruthyunjaya,Darius M. Moshfeghi American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019; [Pubmed] | [DOI] 4 Retinoblastoma Arun D. Singh International Ophthalmology Clinics. 2019; 59(2): 95 [Pubmed] | [DOI] 5 Retinoblastoma in Asia Mukesh Jain,Duangnate Rojanaporn,Bhavna Chawla,Gangadhar Sundar,Lingam Gopal,Vikas Khetan Eye. 2018; [Pubmed] | [DOI]