Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1106
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
GUEST EDITORIAL
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 355-357

Special Issue on Cancer Cachexia


College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Date of Submission16-Jul-2018
Date of Acceptance18-Jul-2018
Date of Web Publication10-Aug-2018

Correspondence Address:
Susan Mcclement
College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Canada
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_39_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mcclement S. Special Issue on Cancer Cachexia. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2018;5:355-7

How to cite this URL:
Mcclement S. Special Issue on Cancer Cachexia. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 17];5:355-7. Available from: http://www.apjon.org/text.asp?2018/5/4/355/238809

“Ask a new question, and you will learn new things.”[1] Cachexia is not a new clinical problem. More than two centuries ago, the Greek physician Hippocrates detailed the relationship between cachexia and chronic heart failure, noting that: “The flesh is consumed and becomes water the abdomen fills with water, the feet and legs swell, the shoulders, clavicles, chest, and thighs melt away this illness is fatal.”[2] Today, we appreciate that cachexia is also a common clinical feature in people living with renal failure,[3] infectious [4] disease, and cancer.[5]

Important work has been conducted to help us better understand the complicated landscape that is cancer cachexia. Experts have labored to develop a consensus definition to capture its salient features.[6] Research is being conducted to understand its precise etiology.[7] Efforts to identify the currently limited pharmacological and nutritional support interventions to help mitigate the ongoing loss of lean muscle mass in advanced disease continues.[8] However, there is still more that we need to understand. We need to ask new questions to learn new things about this vexing clinical problem.

This special issue about cancer cachexia helps to advance that imperative. It consists of four papers whose authors have posed salient questions that have enabled us learn new things about a not so new problem. Dr. Jane Hopkinson asks what we know about the experiences and self-management of eating problems in people receiving cancer treatment. Her scoping review about eating problems patients experience during radiotherapy and systemic anticancer treatment is very instructive – both in what it affirms about our knowledge of cancer cachexia syndrome, and the direction, it provides for future research needed to examine eating problems across all cancer sites, patients' perspectives on self-management of their nutritional care, and ways of empowering and motivating their engagement in it. The dearth of detail identified in her review regarding the practical information on how nutritional interventions are delivered and the lack of rigorous empirical work studying nutritional counseling while troublesome, speaks to the opportunity that exists for those engaged in such counseling to both more fully explicate and evaluate their work, and demonstrate its importance to clinical treatment outcomes. Hopkinson's review underscores the importance of nurses supporting patient self-management of eating problems experienced during cancer treatment by ensuring that nutritional counseling is offered to those cancer patients who are known to benefit from it and that the counseling includes a psychoeducation component that addresses behavior change. Given their knowledge of change theory and frequent contact with patients, and nurses have a key role to play in this regard.

Dr. Granda-Cameron and Mary Pat Lynch ask the question, “How can we guide the care of cancer cachexia patients and identify failures in service hindering the quality of care offered to this patient population?” The genesis for this question was their observation that despite the availability of a one-stop interdisciplinary cancer cachexia clinic model to assess and manage multiple symptoms, some patients did not return for follow-up while others were never referred. Findings from the gap analysis, they conducted about the clinical care being provided speaks to the importance of ensuring a systematic and data-driven approach to identifying needs. The comprehensive interdisciplinary clinical framework the authors advance for quality improvement of the care of patients with cancer cachexia is illuminating. The clinical component of the model shifts our attention from focusing solely on refractory cachexia to include risk assessment and detection of cachexia earlier in the illness trajectory. Health-care organizations are complex entities, and the authors speak to the importance of identifying and mitigating, the myriad of organizational factors that can impede the goal of providing quality care. The Clinical Framework for Quality Care in Cancer Cachexia detailed by the authors may well prove a useful heuristic device for clinicians, educators, researchers, and administrators.

Armed with knowledge about the negative consequences of physical inactivity in the elderly and findings from their previous research documenting muscle depletion in a group of newly-diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, Dr. Morikawa and his colleagues conducted a longitudinal study to examine the changes in physical activity levels among NSCLC patients hospitalized to receive systemic chemotherapy. As part of their investigation, they also asked the question, “What is the impact of cancer cachexia on the recovery of physical activity of those patients?” The findings suggest that individuals exhibiting cachexia at baseline may be more sensitive to the deleterious effects of physical inactivity resulting from prolonged hospitalization. The authors also sound a cautionary note regarding iatrogenic causes of reduced patient activity in hospital, many of which are amenable to nursing intervention, and can inform the plan of care of patients with cachexia.

As part of a larger prospective study examining the early introduction of nonpharmacological multimodal interventions for elderly persons with advanced malignancies receiving chemotherapy, Dr. Mouri and his colleagues questioned the feasibility of an 8 weeks' physical activity educational intervention for elderly cancer patients at high risk of cachexia and its associated impacts on exercise behavior on quality of life. While results must be viewed within study limitations, the finding that engagement in a physical activity intervention is safe, feasible, increases activity, and is associated with improved global quality of life is encouraging. Nurses have an important role to play in physical activity promotive counseling and can add it to their toolkit of interventions aimed at optimizing the care of patients with cancer cachexia.

Authors from the United Kingdom, Japan, and the United States contributed to this special thematic issue on cancer cachexia. I am encouraged that clinicians and scholars from a variety of disciplines across the world are devoting time and attention to this important area of study. They are asking important questions and must continue to do so. Given the complexity of cancer cachexia syndrome, I believe that a multidisciplinary lens is the best way to arrive at a fulsome understanding of its impact and management.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Greenstein G. Sidney Dillon Professor of Astronomy Emeritus at Amherst College. Available from: https://www.azquotes.com/author/39115-George_Greenstein. [Last accessed 2018 Jul 03].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Katz AM, Katz PB. Diseases of the heart in the works of Hippocrates. Br Heart J 1962;24:257-64.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cicoira M, Anker SD, Ronco C. Cardio-renal cachexia syndromes (CRCS): Pathophysiological foundations of a vicious pathological circle. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2011;2:135-42.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Chang SW, Pan WS, Lozano Beltran D, Oleyda Baldelomar L, Solano MA, Tuero I, et al. Gut hormones, appetite suppression and cachexia in patients with pulmonary TB. PLoS One 2013;8:e54564.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Baracos VE. Pitfalls in defining and quantifying cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2011;2:71-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: An international consensus. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:489-95.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Baracos VE. Cancer-associated cachexia and underlying biological mechanisms. Annu Rev Nutr 2006;26:435-61.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lieffers JR, Mourtzakis M, Hall KD, McCargar LJ, Prado CM, Baracos VE, et al. A viscerally driven cachexia syndrome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: Contributions of organ and tumor mass to whole-body energy demands. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:1173-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    

 
  Authors Top

Susan Mcclement




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Authors

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed494    
    Printed61    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded140    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]