Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 142
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 296-306

Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Patients: Influences of Psychological Variables


Division of Health Systems and Analytics, School of Nursing, Duke University, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

Date of Submission18-Jan-2018
Date of Acceptance25-Mar-2018
Date of Web Publication31-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Cristina C Hendrix
School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_16_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Approximately 3.1 million women in the US are living with breast cancer and up to 75% of these women experience cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). CRCI is described as impairments in memory, verbal fluency, thought processes, and attention span. Despite the high prevalence of breast cancer, only a few studies have been published on CRCI and most of these studies primarily focused on its pathophysiological mechanism. However, recent evidence has demonstrated that breast cancer patients with CRCI are more likely to have high level of psychologic distress, suggesting a possible relationship between CRCI and psychologic distress. This review aims to examine existing literature that describes CRCI in relation to psychological distress among breast cancer patients. One thousand four hundred and ninety-eight articles were searched using PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, and one article was additionally pulled from article reference lists. Of these19 studies, psychologic distress has been operationalized in varied ways such as anxiety (n = 3), depression (n = 2), both anxiety and depression (n = 4), stress (n = 4), worry (n = 2), mental fatigue (n = 1), and undefined psychological distress (n = 2). Except for six studies designed as a longitudinal study, the rest of studies used a cross-sectional design. Twelve studies used both subjective and objective measures to assess cognitive function. We found that the patients with high psychological distress displayed lower performance on cognitive function tests. Our finding indicates that psychological variables contributed to CRCI that breast cancer patients experienced. Areas for further investigation are proposed that will advance the care of breast cancer patients with CRCI.

Keywords: Breast cancer, breast neoplasm, cognitive dysfunction, cognitive impairment, emotional, mood, physiological distress, psychological


How to cite this article:
Yang Y, Hendrix CC. Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Patients: Influences of Psychological Variables. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2018;5:296-306

How to cite this URL:
Yang Y, Hendrix CC. Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Patients: Influences of Psychological Variables. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Sep 18];5:296-306. Available from: http://www.apjon.org/text.asp?2018/5/3/296/229876




  Introduction Top


Breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer among women in the US.[1] With advances in medical treatment, breast cancer mortality rates had declined in recent years, resulting in more individuals living with breast cancer. Currently, 3.1 million women in the US are reported as patients living with breast cancer.[2] Often, breast cancer is viewed no longer as an incurable acute disease but follows the trajectory of chronic diseases that is characterized by periods of remission and exacerbation of symptoms.[3] This perspective on breast cancer has broadened the scope of care from treating the disease alone to managing cancer-related symptoms such as cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI).[4],[5]

CRCI is the most frequent complication reported by breast cancer patients [6] and up to 75% of breast cancer patients experience CRCI during active treatments (e.g., chemotherapy and hormonal treatment).[7],[8],[9] Individuals with CRCI often characterize their cognitive problems as impairment in memory and verbal fluency, slowing down of thought processes, and a decrease in their attention span.[10],[11] If unmanaged, CRCI will impair performance at work and home and eventually diminish an individual's quality of life (QoL).[12],[13] CRCI could also progress to long-term cognitive impairment.[14] Older patients with breast cancer and with CRCI have 10% to 15% probability of developing dementia per year compared to about 1% to 2.5% among those without CRCI.[8],[15]

Despite the fact that CRCI is influenced by multifactorial variables, most studies on CRCI had been focused primarily on its pathophysiologic mechanism.[10] Psychological factors that affect the variability of CRCIs clinical manifestations are not fully understood.[8],[16],[17] Moreover, the impact of psychological variables (e.g., anxiety, stress, depression, worry, and mental fatigue) that have received attention in diseases with cognitive impairment such as dementia [18],[19],[20] has not been explored within the context of CRCI in breast cancer. Only very few studies have been conducted on CRCI in breast cancer.

Background

CRCI is defined as one or more impaired functions of interrelated cognitive process.[21] Patients with CRCI describe their condition as frequent forgetfulness (e.g., names, date, or telephone numbers), slow-progressing speeds, and difficulties in concentration, multitasking, and word retrieval.[8],[22] In most cases, breast cancer patients seldom anticipate that they will have to deal with CRCI during the illness trajectory of cancer.[13] This unexpected event leads to frustration and embarrassment in breast cancer patients.[13]

CRCI can be classified as subtle, moderate, and severe using scores obtained from neuropsychological testing. Based on criteria developed by Vardy et al., subtle CRCI is defined as −1 to –1.49 standard deviation (SD) below population normative means; −1.5 to −1.99 SD below the normative means can be defined as moderate CRCI, and equal and below −2 SD is defined as severe CRCI.[23] Using these criteria, 11%–27% breast cancer patients who are recovering from surgical removal for their breast cancer were found to have moderate or severe impairment on verbal fluency and 14%–17% complained of memory impairment.[11]

To assess CRCI in patients, neuropsychological tests and self-reports are commonly used [Table 1].[22],[24] Neuropsychological tests objectively assess each domain of cognitive function such as memory, verbal fluency, speed of processing, and attention. Examples of neuropsychological tests and subjective measures to assess CRCI are in [Table 1].[11],[24],[25],[26] Although arguments exist against the validity of patients' self-reports, subtle decline in patients' cognitive function may be better detected by this method rather than the use of neuropsychological testing.[27]
Table 1: Neuropsychological tests and self-reports

Click here to view


CRCI in breast cancer patients varies across the illness trajectory. Approximately 30%–40% patients experienced CRCI before any type of cancer treatments. Factors such as age, menopausal status, education, or psychological variables have been known to contribute toward the incidence of CRCI before the initiation of any treatments.[25],[28] Of those who experienced CRCI before cancer treatments, approximately 60% reported persistent CRCI after the completion of cancer treatments.[14],[29],[30],[31],[32] Mostly, the phenomenon of persistent CRCI can be explained by psychological variables.[33],[34] Patients with high psychological distress were likely to display lower performance on cognitive function tests.

Psychological well-being is easily threatened in life-limiting illnesses such as cancer. While the association of psychological variables with physical [35] and mental health [36] has been studied widely, it has not been studied in relation to cognitive health in breast cancer patients. Therefore, this review paper will describe the findings of several studies on psychological variables and CRCI in breast cancer. Areas for investigation are proposed that will contribute toward the science in the care of breast cancer patients with CRCI.


  Methods Top


Search strategy

A literature search was conducted in PubMed (724 hits), CINAHL (304 hits), and PsycINFO (470 hits) to identify studies reporting CRCI in breast cancer patients. “Breast neoplasm” and “breast cancer” were used for the search in combination with other key terms: cognitive impairment/cognitive dysfunction/cognitive disorders/memory/memory disorders/cognitive/psychological/physiological distress/emotional/mood. Literature published from 1980 to 2017 was included to capture relevant articles to describe CRCI in relation to psychological variables of breast cancer patients.

Selection criteria

Studies which met the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) studies that discussed psychological variables of CRCI in female breast cancer patients aged 18 years and above and (2) academic journals published in English. Of 1498 research studies, those that did not describe the relationship between CRCI and psychological variables were excluded from the literature review. A total of 18 articles were included in this literature review.

Search outcomes

The detailed search procedures are described in [Figure 1]. Intervention studies were not included for this review as the intervention performed in these studies may confound the association between CRCI and psychological variables which will be difficult to eliminate. Two independent researchers assessed the eligibility based on the selection criteria. Each researcher reviewed titles, abstracts, and full texts individually and compared the search outcomes. To assess the quality of each article, the independent researchers had to agree that research question and study population were properly stated and identified, and study measures were clearly described and pertained to a psychological variable. After title and abstract review, we first excluded 700 studies, 49 studies remained. We further eliminated 32 studies by reviewing full-texts, and 18 studies were retained. One article was pulled from one article's reference list. A total of 19 articles were included in this literature review.
Figure 1: Search flow

Click here to view



  Results Top


Study characteristics

Of the 19 studies that met inclusion criteria, 13 were cross-sectional and 6 were longitudinal. The studies were conducted in the United States (n = 8), Germany (n = 3), the Netherlands (n = 2), Australia (n = 1), Turkey (n = 1), China (n = 1), Singapore (n = 1), Italy (n = 1), and Japan (n = 1). Sample sizes ranged from 23 to 299, and ten studies had sample sizes below 100. More than half of the studies (n = 12) used both subjective and objective measures to assess cognitive function. In studies involving breast cancer patients with CRCI, psychological variables were operationalized in varied ways such as anxiety (n = 3), depression (n = 4), both anxiety and depression (n = 3), stress (n = 4), worry (n = 2), mental fatigue (n = 1), and undefined psychological distress (n = 2). Study characteristics are summarized in [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8].
Table 2: Characteristics of studies regarding the association of cognitive function with anxiety

Click here to view
Table 3: Characteristics of studies regarding the association of cognitive function with depression

Click here to view
Table 4: Characteristics of studies regarding the association of cognitive function with both anxiety and depression

Click here to view
Table 5: Characteristics of studies regarding the association of cognitive function with stress

Click here to view
Table 6: Characteristics of studies regarding the association of cognitive function with worry

Click here to view
Table 7: Characteristics of studies regarding the association of cognitive function with mental fatigue

Click here to view
Table 8: Characteristics of studies regarding the association of cognitive function with undefined psychological distress

Click here to view


Anxiety

Three studies used anxiety. Anxiety was defined as a sense of fear and tension [37] [Table 2]. A study conducted on 45 women who were waiting for breast cancer surgery investigated how preoperative anxiety was related to directed attention.[38] The participants were divided into three anxiety level groups, and their cognitive performance was measured by objective and subjective tests in each group. There was no significant difference in the mean scores of the objective test; however, statistically significant relationship was found in subjective test in each group (r = −0.63, P < 0.01) with greater cognitive impairment found in patients with high anxiety.

Another study conducted on 166 breast cancer patients examined the association between self-perceived CRCI and anxiety.[39] The findings demonstrated that CRCI was significantly related to the level of anxiety among breast cancer patients (r = −0.58, P < 0.001). The authors stated that anxiety could play a role in increasing the level of CRCI.

A recent cross-sectional study demonstrated a decline in concentration/memory function in breast cancer patients who have completed chemotherapy.[34] Scores on each cognitive test were inversely related to their anxiety level (concentration; r = −0.588, P = 0.006; memory, r = −.523, P = 0.018). Findings suggested that patients who scored lower on neuropsychological tests reported more symptoms of anxiety.

Depression

Depression can be described as a state of feeling sad and hopeless.[40] Three studies focused on the relationship of depression and CRCI in breast cancer patients [Table 3]. Findings of one study that assessed direct attention functioning in 32 breast cancer patients suggested an association between attentional functioning and depression.[41] The participants with negative or depressed mood gave lower scores on self-reported attentional function. Although no detailed information was provided about the relationship between depression and CRCI in the breast cancer patients, the authors concluded that depressed mood could be associated with the severity of patients' CRCI.

Another study examined CRCI measured by objective and subjective tests in breast cancer patients.[42] Except for Stoop test, no correlation was noted between depression and the patients' performance on objective tests. Scores on Stoop test assessing visual attention showed a negative relationship with depression (r = −0.67, P = 0.03), indicating that the patients with depression were more likely to display impairments in visual attention. In addition, patients with depression scored lower on the subjective tests (r = −0.45, P = 0.07).

Depression was also identified as a predictor of the progression of CRCI.[33] Patients reported a decline in executive function after the completion of chemotherapy and this turned out to be associated with patients' baseline level of depression (r = 0.26, P < 0.01). In other words, depression negatively influences the changes in the patients' executive function. This relationship was also supported by one cross-sectional study that found that patients who are depressed performed poorly on the test measuring cognitive errors than those in nondepression group.[43]

Both anxiety and depression

Three studies found an association between both anxiety and depression and CRCI in breast cancer patients [Table 4]. One longitudinal study assessed the association of breast cancer patients' CRCI with both anxiety and depression.[44] While their actual performance on objective tests was not associated with both anxiety and depression, greater decline in self-perceived CRCI was noted when they suffered from high levels of depression and anxiety.

Similarly, the association of self-perceived CRCI with both anxiety and depression was also reported in another study.[45] Findings demonstrated that self-perceived CRCI was moderately associated with both levels of anxiety and depression before endocrine treatments (T1) (r = 0.22, P < 0.01), and this relationship became stronger 1 year after the completion of treatment (r = 0.34, P < 0.01). Only a weak association was found in the relationship of objectively assessed CRCI and the levels of both anxiety and depression.

Another longitudinal study found that changes in scores of cognitive function tests were significantly associated with the changes in scores for psychological distress (r = −0.50 to −0.48, P < 0.05).[46] In this study, psychological distress was defined as anxiety and depression. The author concluded that higher degree of cognitive impairment was found in patients experiencing higher levels of anxiety and depression.

Stress

Stress is described as a sense of feeling overwhelmed,[47] and four studies in this review examined the relationship of stress with CRCI in breast cancer patients [Table 5]. Of 36 patients who completed neuropsychological testing before chemotherapy, 27% complained of impairments in verbal fluency followed by 14% reporting impairments in memory function.[11] Patients with lower scores from measuring immediate memory, delayed memory, verbal fluency, and attention demonstrated higher scores on stress as measured by self-reported stress measurement (r = −0.37~−0.51, P < 0.01).

This relationship of stress and CRCI was also investigated in other two studies conducted by Hermelink et al.[48],[49] Both two studies reported that breast cancer patients could experience posttraumatic stress (PTSD) after cancer diagnosis, and those who experienced PTSD displayed more cognitive errors than others without PTSD (Beta = 0.27, P = 0.004).[48] This relationship was further elaborated in their recent study.[49] The authors identified a positive correlation of PTSD with CRCI (r = 0.26–0.42, P < 0.0001). In addition, poor performance on Go/No-go tasks (one of cognitive tests) could be mediated by PTSD symptom (mediation effect: B = 0.15).

Consistent with prior studies, a study conducted in China reported that PTSD symptom contributed to CRCI among breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.[50] Patients with more PTSD symptoms scored lower on self-report cognitive testing. This suggested that PTSD symptoms are associated with CRCI (r = −0.54, P < 0.001).

Worry

While worry may be interpreted as similar to anxiety, worry is more narrowly conceptualized to concerns about the future event.[51] Two studies showed the relationship of worry and CRCI in breast cancer patients [Table 6]. One study reported that a higher level of worry was strongly associated with self-perceived and objectively assessed CRCI in breast cancer patients regardless of their treatment status (e.g., prechemotherapy or preradiation therapy).[28] Breast cancer patients with high levels of worry demonstrated lower accuracy and worse performance on VMWT (r = 0.25, P = 0.08 for low demand, r = 0.25, P = 0.08 for medium, and r = 0.30, P = 0.08 for high). Furthermore, patients produced low scores on a subjective test when they reported high worry (r = −0.57, P < 0.001). In addition, brain MRI in patients with high level of worry showed the inability to deactivate regions of the precuneus/posterior cingulate that regulates cognitive performance.

Similarly, a recent longitudinal study found that, as patients experienced high worry, the greater self-perceived confidence interval (CI) was assessed at 1 year after surgery for breast cancer (M12).[52] In addition, a small but significant relationship of self-perceived CI with worry was assessed at M12 (r = 0.34, P < 0.001). On the contrary, objectively assessed CI at M12 using scores of VMWT was not associated with worry.

Mental fatigue

Mental fatigue refers to a failure to complete mental tasks, contributing to a decrease in both work and study efficiency.[53] One study discussed the relationship of mental fatigue with the alternation of brain mechanism in breast cancer patients who have completed cancer treatments [Table 7].[54] Findings showed that the patients presenting a high level of mental fatigue displayed greater connectivity from left inferior parietal lobule to superior frontal gyrus on MRI images than nonfatigued patients. This increased connectivity was associated with higher levels of mental fatigue (r = 0.82, P = 0.05). Furthermore, the association between fatigue and greater default mode network (DMN) connectivity to the superior frontal gyrus was noted. This enhanced connectivity between DMN to frontal gyrus indicated a decline in cognitive performance.

Undefined psychological distress

Two studies examined the relationship between CRCI and patients' overall psychological distress [Table 8]. One study found that newly diagnosed breast cancer patients performed poorly on objective test when they suffered high psychological distress [25] (r = −0.21, P < 0.05). Furthermore, patients more often reported self-perceived CRCI when their distress was high (r = −0.62, P < 0.001).

Another study examined each domain of cognitive function (e.g., verbal memory) in postsurgical breast cancer patients and their overall psychological distress.[55] Based on the results, poor performance on verbal memory was correlated with high depression (r = −0.29, P = 0.006); using the same logic, poor performance on processing speed was correlated with high psychological distress (r = −0.418, P = 0.001), low psychological well-being (r = 0.334, P = 0.001), and high anxiety (r = −0.29, P = 0.003). Study authors concluded that depressed patients demonstrated impairment in verbal memory and patients with high levels of anxiety and psychological distress performed poorly on processing speed test.


  Discussion Top


To the best our knowledge, this is the first review paper that examined the association between CRCI and psychological variables in breast cancer patients. Of the 19 studies reviewed, depression (n = 4) and stress (n = 4) were the most frequent variables reported, followed by anxiety (n = 3), both anxiety and depression (n = 3), worry (n = 2), undefined psychological distress (n = 2), and mental fatigue (n = 1). Overall, we found that psychological variables either predicted the progression of CRCI [33],[46],[48] or simply were associated with the phenomenon of CRCI.[11],[25],[28],[34],[38],[39],[41],[42],[43],[44],[45],[49],[52],[54],[55] Patients waiting for cancer treatments reported anxiety, stress, and overall psychological distress as factors closely related to CRCI. Majority of those who were actively receiving treatment chose either or both depression and anxiety. Finally, depression was reported as a variable which was associated with CRCI that posttreatment patients experienced.

Results from this review paper showed inconsistent association of CRCI and psychological variables. For example, some studies found a significant relationship between CRCI and psychological variables; however, others found weak relationship only. This inconsistency may be due to a wide variation in sample size, characteristics of sample, study design, and measurements. Importantly, self-perceived CRCI seems to be associated more frequently with psychological variables (anxiety and depression) than objectively measured CRCI. This needs further elaboration as it will influence how to measure CRCI in future studies. In addition, it would be critical to include confounders that potentially affect the association of CRCI with psychological variables as well as having adequate sample size to have confidence in the study results.

We also found that many studies examined the association of CRCI with psychological variable cross-sectionally instead of longitudinally that will allow to assess the trajectory of cognitive function and psychological variables [45],[52],[54] across time. The manifestations of CRCI could change throughout the trajectory of illness or by the accumulated impacts of psychological variables. Therefore, a longitudinal examination of CRCI and its associated variables may provide more in-depth knowledge about CRCI and its mediators and moderators.

There are limitations in this review paper. Only observational studies were included because the heterogeneity in study designs may cause findings to become difficult to understand. Another limitation of this review was that a total of 19 studies used convenience sampling methods. Samples collected through convenience sampling method are less representative of target population than that of consecutive sampling method.[56] More studies with heterogeneous sample need to be conducted to promote applicability of results to broader breast cancer population. It would also be helpful to expand future search strategy to other cancer population to determine the generalizability of results found in this review.


  Conclusion Top


This review paper presented updated information, showing the relationship between psychological variables and CRCI. Depression was found to be the most frequent variable associated with CRCI followed by anxiety, both anxiety and depression, worry, undefined psychological distress, and mental fatigue. Given these review findings, future research needs to consider the type of measurements used to measure CRCI (objective vs. subjective) and study design (cross-sectional vs. longitudinal). As the number of individuals with cancer continues to rise, there is a need to increase efforts in developing interventions for best practice to advance the care of this patient population. Many breast cancer patients are at high risk for CRCI that negatively affects their QoL. Enhanced information about CRCI will provide the foundation for developing multifactorial interventions for breast cancer patients with CRCI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast Cancer; 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/. [Last accessed on 2017 Jul 14].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures; 2017. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/cancer-facts-and-figures-2017.pdf.[Last accessed on 2018 Mar 18].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
American Cancer Society. Managing Cancer as a Chronic Illness; 2016. Avaialble from: https://www.cancer.org/treatment/survivorship-during-and-after-treatment/when-cancer-doesnt-go-away.html.[Last accessed on 2018 Mar 18].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ferguson RJ, Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, McDonald BC, Furstenberg CT, Cole BF, et al. Cognitive-behavioral management of chemotherapy-related cognitive change. Psychooncology 2007;16:772-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Shoemaker LK, Estfan B, Induru R, Walsh TD. Symptom management: An important part of cancer care. Cleve Clin J Med 2011;78:25-34.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Schmidt JE, Beckjord E, Bovbjerg DH, Low CA, Posluszny DM, Lowery AE, et al. Prevalence of perceived cognitive dysfunction in survivors of a wide range of cancers: Results from the 2010 LIVESTRONG survey. J Cancer Surviv 2016;10:302-11.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ahles TA, Root JC, Ryan EL. Cancer- and cancer treatment-associated cognitive change: An update on the state of the science. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:3675-86.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Janelsins MC, Kohli S, Mohile SG, Usuki K, Ahles TA, Morrow GR, et al. An update on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: Current status. Semin Oncol 2011;38:431-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bender CM, Ergÿn FS, Rosenzweig MQ, Cohen SM, Sereika SM. Symptom clusters in breast cancer across 3 phases of the disease. Cancer Nurs 2005;28:219-25.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Merriman JD, Von Ah D, Miaskowski C, Aouizerat BE. Proposed mechanisms for cancer- and treatment-related cognitive changes. Semin Oncol Nurs 2013;29:260-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Reid-Arndt SA, Cox CR. Stress, coping and cognitive deficits in women after surgery for breast cancer. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2012;19:127-37.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Boykoff N, Moieni M, Subramanian SK. Confronting chemobrain: An in-depth look at survivors' reports of impact on work, social networks, and health care response. J Cancer Surviv 2009;3:223-32.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Myers JS. Cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive changes: The patient experience. Semin Oncol Nurs 2013;29:300-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Janelsins MC, Kesler SR, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. Prevalence, mechanisms, and management of cancer-related cognitive impairment. Int Rev Psychiatry 2014;26:102-13.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, Heeringa SG, Weir DR, Ofstedal MB, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:427-34.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Andreotti C, Root JC, Ahles TA, McEwen BS, Compas BE. Cancer, coping, and cognition: A model for the role of stress reactivity in cancer-related cognitive decline. Psychooncology 2015;24:617-23.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bray VJ, Dhillon, HM, Vardy JL. Cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer survivors: A review of the literature. Cancer Forum2017;41:46-54.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Holwerda TJ, Deeg DJ, Beekman AT, van Tilburg TG, Stek ML, Jonker C, et al. Feelings of loneliness, but not social isolation, predict dementia onset: Results from the amsterdam study of the elderly (AMSTEL). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:135-42.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ramakers IH, Honings ST, Ponds RW, Aalten P, Sebastian K, Verhey FR, et al. The effect of psychological distress and personality traits on cognitive performances and the risk of dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 2015;46:805-12.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Rosness TA, Strand BH, Bergem AL, Nafstad P, Langballe EM, Engedal K, et al. Association of psychological distress late in life and dementia-related mortality. Aging Ment Health 2016;20:603-10.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Von Ah D, Jansen C, Allen DH, Schiavone RM, Wulff J. Putting evidence into practice: Evidence-based interventions for cancer and cancer treatment-related cognitive impairment. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2011;15:607-15.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Von Ah D, Habermann B, Carpenter JS, Schneider BL. Impact of perceived cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2013;17:236-41.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Vardy J, Rourke S, Tannock IF. Evaluation of cognitive function associated with chemotherapy: A review of published studies and recommendations for future research. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2455-63.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Von Ah D, Tallman EF. Perceived cognitive function in breast cancer survivors: Evaluating relationships with objective cognitive performance and other symptoms using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function instrument. J Pain Symptom Manage 2015;49:697-706.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Cimprich B, So H, Ronis DL, Trask C. Pre-treatment factors related to cognitive functioning in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2005;14:70-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Cimprich B, Visovatti M, Ronis DL. The attentional function index – A self-report cognitive measure. Psychooncology 2011;20:194-202.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Jean-Pierre P. Management of cancer-related cognitive dysfunction-conceptualization challenges and implications for clinical research and practice. US Oncol 2010;6:9-12.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Berman MG, Askren MK, Jung M, Therrien B, Peltier S, Noll DC, et al. Pretreatment worry and neurocognitive responses in women with breast cancer. Health Psychol 2014;33:222-31.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Wefel JS, Kesler SR, Noll KR, Schagen SB. Clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of noncentral nervous system cancer-related cognitive impairment in adults. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:123-38.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, McDonald BC, Furstenberg CT, Cole BF, Hanscom BS, et al. Cognitive function in breast cancer patients prior to adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;110:143-52.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Jansen CE, Cooper BA, Dodd MJ, Miaskowski CA. A prospective longitudinal study of chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes in breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2011;19:1647-56.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Wefel JS, Saleeba AK, Buzdar AU, Meyers CA. Acute and late onset cognitive dysfunction associated with chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Cancer 2010;116:3348-56.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Vearncombe KJ, Rolfe M, Wright M, Pachana NA, Andrew B, Beadle G, et al. Predictors of cognitive decline after chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2009;15:951-62.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Wirkner J, Weymar M, Löw A, Hamm C, Struck AM, Kirschbaum C, et al. Cognitive functioning and emotion processing in breast cancer survivors and controls: An ERP pilot study. Psychophysiology 2017;54:1209-22.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Levesque P, Mondor M, Robert J, Robidoux A, et al. Psychological distress and physical health in the year after diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;120:685-91.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Saeedi-Saedi H, Shahidsales S, Koochak-Pour M, Sabahi E, Moridi I. Evaluation of emotional distress in breast cancer patients. Iran J Cancer Prev 2015;8:36-41.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
American Psychological Association. Anxiety. Available from: http://www.apa.org/topics/anxiety/index.aspx. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 18].  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Lehto RH, Cimprich B. Anxiety and directed attention in women awaiting breast cancer surgery. Oncol Nurs Forum 1999;26:767-72.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Cheung YT, Shwe M, Chui WK, Chay WY, Ang SF, Dent RA, et al. Effects of chemotherapy and psychosocial distress on perceived cognitive disturbances in Asian breast cancer patients. Ann Pharmacother 2012;46:1645-55.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
National Institute of Mental Health. Depression Basics; 2016. Available from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/depression/index.shtml. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 18].  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Cimprich B. Attentional fatigue following breast cancer surgery. Res Nurs Health 1992;15:199-207.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Freeman JR, Broshek DK. Assessing cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer: What are the tools? Clin Breast Cancer 2002;3 Suppl 3:S91-9.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Alcalar N, Ozkan S, Kucucuk S, Aslay I, Ozkan M. Association of coping style, cognitive errors and cancer-related variables with depression in women treated for breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2012;42:940-7.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Biglia N, Bounous VE, Malabaila A, Palmisano D, Torta DM, D'Alonzo M, et al. Objective and self-reported cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer women treated with chemotherapy: A prospective study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2012;21:485-92.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Schilder CM, Seynaeve C, Linn SC, Boogerd W, Beex LV, Gundy CM, et al. Self-reported cognitive functioning in postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during endocrine treatment: Findings from the neuropsychological TEAM side-study. Psychooncology 2012;21:479-87.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Ando-Tanabe N, Iwamitsu Y, Kuranami M, Okazaki S, Yasuda H, Nakatani Y, et al. Cognitive function in women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and healthy controls. Breast Cancer 2014;21:453-62.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
American Psychological Association (n.d.). Understanding Chronic Stress. Available from http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/understanding-chronic-stress.aspx. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 18].  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Hermelink K, Voigt V, Kaste J, Neufeld F, Wuerstlein R, Bühner M, et al. Elucidating pretreatment cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients: The impact of cancer-related post-traumatic stress. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107. pii: djv099.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Hermelink K, Bühner M, Sckopke P, Neufeld F, Kaste J, Voigt V, et al. Chemotherapy and post-traumatic stress in the causation of cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017;109:dxj057.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Li J, Yu L, Long Z, Li Y, Cao F. Perceived cognitive impairment in chinese patients with breast cancer and its relationship with post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and fatigue. Psychooncology 2015;24:676-82.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Zebb BJ, Beck JG. Worry versus anxiety. Is there really a difference? Behav Modif 1998;22:45-61.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Jung MS, Zhang M, Askren MK, Berman MG, Peltier S, Hayes DF, et al. Cognitive dysfunction and symptom burden in women treated for breast cancer: A prospective behavioral and fMRI analysis. Brain Imaging Behav 2017;11:86-97.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Mizuno K, Tanaka M, Yamaguti K, Kajimoto O, Kuratsune H, Watanabe Y, et al. Mental fatigue caused by prolonged cognitive load associated with sympathetic hyperactivity. Behav Brain Funct 2011;7:17.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Hampson JP, Zick SM, Khabir T, Wright BD, Harris RE. Altered resting brain connectivity in persistent cancer related fatigue. Neuroimage Clin 2015;8:305-13.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Menning S, de Ruiter MB, Veltman DJ, Koppelmans V, Kirschbaum C, Boogerd W, et al. Multimodal MRI and cognitive function in patients with breast cancer prior to adjuvant treatment – The role of fatigue. Neuroimage Clin 2015;7:547-54.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Wolters-Kluwer Pubs.; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 56
    

 
  Authors Top

Cristina C. Hendrix


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8]


This article has been cited by
1 Cytokine-associated fatigue prior to, during, and post-chemotherapy for breast cancer
R.A. Cohen,J.M. Gullett,A.J. Woods,E.C. Porges,A. Starkweather,C.K. Jackson-Cook,D.L. Lynch-Kelly,D.E. Lyon
Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2019; 334: 577001
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Authors
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1419    
    Printed57    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded211    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]