Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 568
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 342-347

Anterior tibial artery perforator plus flaps: Role in coverage of posttumor excision defects around the knee joint and upper leg


1 Plastic Surgeon, Divine Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery Centre, Ahemdabad, Gujarat, India
2 Department of Oncosurgery, Gujarat Cancer Research Institute, Ahemdabad, Gujarat, India
3 Plastic Surgeon, Lakshmi Hospital, Dombivali, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
4 Orthopedic Surgeon, Pramukswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India

Correspondence Address:
Abhijeet Ashok Salunke
Fellow Orthopedic Oncosurgery (NUH Singapore), Consultant Orthopedic Oncosurgeon, Gujarat Cancer Research Institute, Ahemdabad
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_32_17

Rights and Permissions

Objective: Posttumor excision defects can be very large, and many do require postoperative radiotherapy. It is therefore important to provide stable and durable wound coverage to provide ability to withstand radiotherapy as well as providing cover to vital structures. Methods: Between July 2014 and June 2016, eight females and six male patients with defects around the knee were operated upon using a perforator plus flap from the anterior tibial artery perforator. In all except two patients, the defects were the result of posttumor extirpation, while in the latter, it was due to impending implant exposure following bone tumor excision and tibial prosthesis. A constant perforator at the neck of the fibula was found using hand-held Doppler. The base of the flap was always kept intact. The flap was then transposed toward the defect and inset in a tensionless manner. Results: The average flap dimension was 14 cm × 5.5 cm. The mean follow-up was 11 months (6–20 months). All the flaps survived well except in one patient who developed partial tip necrosis, providing stable coverage of the wound. Two patients developed local recurrence and had to undergo above-knee amputation. Conclusions: The planning for the reconstruction of defects following tumor resection is to be done in accordance with a multidisciplinary team approach involving oncosurgeon, reconstructive plastic surgeons, and radiation specialist. The perforator plus flap is an excellent choice in defects around the knee to cover neurovascular structures, bone, or implant.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1157    
    Printed21    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded204    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal