Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 255
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 127-135

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: An innovation in immunotherapy for the treatment and management of patients with cancer


1 City University of New York-Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA
2 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Date of Submission10-Jan-2017
Date of Acceptance31-Jan-2017
Date of Web Publication13-Apr-2017

Correspondence Address:
Jennifer Dine
Post-Doctoral Fellow/Visiting Assistant Professor The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_4_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Cancer survival rates are generally increasing in the United States. These trends have been partially attributed to improvement in therapeutic strategies. Cancer immunotherapy is an example of one of the newer strategies used to fight cancer, which primes or activates the immune system to produce antitumor effects. The first half of this review paper concisely describes the cell mechanisms that control antitumor immunity and the major immunotherapeutic strategies developed to target these mechanisms. The second half of the review discusses in greater depth immune checkpoint inhibitors that have recently demonstrated tremendous promise for the treatment of diverse solid tumor types, including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and others. More specifically, the mechanisms of action, side effects, and patient and family management and education concerns are discussed to provide oncology nurses up-to-date information relevant to caring for cancer-affected patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Future directions for cancer immunotherapy are considered.

Keywords: Cancer immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor, oncology nursing, symptom management


How to cite this article:
Dine J, Gordon R, Shames Y, Kasler MK, Barton-Burke M. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: An innovation in immunotherapy for the treatment and management of patients with cancer. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2017;4:127-35

How to cite this URL:
Dine J, Gordon R, Shames Y, Kasler MK, Barton-Burke M. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: An innovation in immunotherapy for the treatment and management of patients with cancer. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 19];4:127-35. Available from: http://www.apjon.org/text.asp?2017/4/2/127/204487




  Introduction Top


According to the National Cancer Institute, approximately 39% of all Americans will develop cancer at some point in their lifetime.[1] However, the overall mortality rate of those diagnosed with cancer has declined, in part due to improvements in therapeutic approaches. The development of immunotherapies reflects a promising new approach to cancer treatment involving activation of the immune system against cancer.[2],[3]

The use of immunotherapy for cancer has become widespread in recent decades and is used to treat both solid and hematological malignances.[4] Immune checkpoint inhibitors, in particular, have demonstrated considerable promise in their recent approval for the treatment of melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and other cancers.[5] Thus, with the inclusion of immunotherapy in cancer treatment regimens, it is imperative that oncology nurses are knowledgeable about the mechanisms of action, treatment regimens, and symptoms associated with these new agents to optimally educate and manage patients and families. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an overview of immunotherapies, including a review of the cancer-immunity cycle, and an update on immune checkpoint inhibitors and their associated toxicity, management, and patient and family education concerns for the oncology nurse.


  Defining Immunotherapy Top


Cancer immunotherapy involves the utilization of naturally derived or synthetically generated components to stimulate or enhance the immune system to fight cancer.[6] In 1891, Dr. William B. Coley developed the first known immunotherapeutic strategy for humans by inoculating patients affected by sarcoma with bacteria that stimulated a sustained antitumor immune response.[7] This seminal observation laid the foundation for investigating the interplay between a person's immune defenses and malignant cells.

The immune system engages in a complex balance wherein identification and eradication of foreign antigens is counterbalanced with processes necessary for suppressing an uncontrolled immune response. Regulation of the T-cell-mediated response to antigen presenting cells (APCs), including foreign and the body's own dendritic cells, is critical to eliminating cancer cells.[8],[9] More specifically, CD8+ effector T-cells, or cytotoxic T-cells, can recognize “self” and “nonself” antigens bound to major histocompatibility class I complexes that are expressed on APCs. Dendritic cells process and present the antigen to T-cells, which allows them to recognize the foreign cells that express the antigen.[10] Due to genetic mutation and aberrant cellular processes,[11] cancer cells will produce neoantigens that normal host defenses will not recognize as “self.” This results in the production of cytotoxic T-cells that will be able to identify the neoantigen-presenting cells (i.e., cancer cells) for elimination. However, an immune response is rarely mounted against the cancer cell, which has been hypothesized to be due, in part, to immunosuppressive mechanisms that are physiologically necessary to prevent an exaggerated and damaging immune response.[12] These findings raise questions concerning the inhibitory and stimulatory processes requisite for robust anticancer immunity while minimizing potentially harmful side effects.[5],[13]


  The Cancer-Immunity Cycle Top


Recently, studies have shown that inhibitory signaling pathways, or immune checkpoints, may prevent the mounting of an immune response.[14] While the ability to evade immune surveillance has been identified as an important characteristic of cancer,[15] the cellular mechanisms that govern anticancer immunity are still being elucidated. To provide a cohesive model of the processes involved in fostering anticancer immunity, Chen and Mellman described the cancer-immunity cycle, which sequentially links together events that must be allowed to recursively occur to mount an effective immune response against cancer [Box 1].[13] In order for the cycle to proceed, inhibitory processes, including the activation of immune checkpoint inhibitors that suppress cytotoxic T-cell recognition of cancer, must be overridden. The identification of these inhibitory processes in the cycle has since led to the development of therapeutic strategies that have been designed to overcome them and fight cancer.[13]


  Immunotherapeutic Strategies Top


Cancer immunotherapies possess distinct mechanisms of action and primarily fall into the following categories: Adoptive T-cell transfer, oncolytic viruses, cancer vaccines, and monoclonal antibodies. The following section will provide a brief description of the aforementioned immunotherapeutic strategies.

Adoptive T-cell transfer involves the genetic engineering of patients' own T-cells to recognize cancer cells. T-cells are grown in large volumes and modified to express receptors that allow them to recognize cancer cells. They are then infused back into the patient to fight cancer and are associated with lasting benefits. This type of strategy is also sometimes called chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and currently is in clinical trial testing.[16],[17]

Oncolytic viruses utilize specially modified viruses to infect and destroy cancer cells. These special viruses, which are designed to avoid normal tissues, will recognize a specific antigen on the surface of cancer cells. The virus will then infect the cancer cell, replicate inside it, and eventually rupture the cell. When the cell dies, antigens are released, which activates the immune system to seek out and destroy more cancer cells. Currently, talimogene laherparepvec, or T-VEC, for melanoma is the only vaccine approved for cancer treatment.[16]

Cancer vaccines involve exposing the immune system to an antigen for prevention or cure. In both instances, the immune system will recognize antigens expressed on cancer cells to facilitate their elimination. Currently, there are more preventive vaccines available than curative, including two vaccines that foster immunity against forms of the human papillomavirus that are associated with cancer development. Only one curative vaccine, sipuleucel-T, is available for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. This therapy involves exposing patient-derived APCs to prostatic acidic phosphatase, which is an antigen widely expressed on prostate cancer cells, and infusing these cells back into the patient to prime and activate other immune cells for recognizing and eliminating cancer.[16],[18]

Finally, monoclonal antibodies are proteins manufactured by immune cells to specifically recognize a cell target. In the context of cancer treatment, monoclonal antibodies can suppress the activity of a specific protein in the cancer cell to kill the cell or prevent it from growing. Monoclonal antibodies are also used for cancer immunotherapy, most notably in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitors.[16] The immune checkpoint proteins, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated 4 (CTLA-4), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), are receptors expressed on the surface of cytotoxic T-cells that interact with their ligands cluster differential 80 (CD80)/cluster differential 86 (CD86) and programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1) on APCs, which helps the cancer cell evade T-cell-mediated death. Immune checkpoint inhibitors prevent the receptors and ligands from binding to each other, thereby disrupting signaling [Figure 1].[4],[5],[10],[12] These agents have recently demonstrated improved survival outcomes for adults with solid tumors in clinical trials and have subsequently been approved to treat several disease types, including melanoma. Approved immune checkpoint inhibitors include the anti-CTLA-4 agent, ipilimumab; anti-PD-1 agents, nivolumab and pembrolizumab; and anti-PDL-1 agent, atezolizumab [Table 1].[5]
Figure 1: Therapeutic targets of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Click here to view
Table 1: Food and Drug Administration approved immune checkpoint inhibitors


Click here to view



  Nursing Care and Management of Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Top


The successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in recent years has brought hope for cure and survival for those suffering from various cancers. To address the unique immune-related side effects of checkpoint inhibitors, this section of the paper addresses the associated toxicities, patient management, and nursing care considerations.

Nurses are instrumental in providing patients a fundamental understanding of immunotherapy that helps them understand the need for prompt identification and careful surveillance during and after therapy. Patient management and nursing care strategies can improve a patient's quality of life, while minimizing treatment delays or early discontinuation of therapy.[19] Managing patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors involves ongoing education that addresses how these agents work, their side effects, and patient management and nursing care strategies. A sample patient education tool is provided to exemplify critical immunotherapy-related information that needs to be conveyed to patients and families [Figure 2].[20] Many patients with previous chemotherapy experience may have preconceived notions about what their new treatment experiences will be like. Patient education should include a discussion of immune activation and how responses to immunotherapy differ from that of chemotherapy.[21]
Figure 2: Sample immunotherapy education tool for patients


Click here to view


Specifically, immunotherapy can take longer to elicit a response than conventional chemotherapy, and patients may experience stable disease or even progression after initial treatment before observing improvement. Furthermore, side effects tend to be characterized by inflammation and require vigilance in observing and reporting to providers to facilitate a timely intervention. Patients need to be educated on these unique responses attributed to immunotherapy since they may be unexpected.[22]


  Gastrointestinal Side Effects Top


Immune-mediated colitis is one of the most prevalent side effects associated with checkpoint blockade. In patients treated with ipilimumab, the overall incidence of diarrhea and colitis has been reported as 32.8%.[23] Ipilimumab-induced diarrhea has been associated with bowel perforation and subsequent death.[24] This side effect has also been seen in patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. The onset of symptoms has been observed within 6–7 weeks following the initiation of ipilimumab treatment, and 6–18 weeks in patients treated with PD-1 blockade.[25] Clinical presentation includes watery bowel movements, blood or mucus in stool, flatulence, and abdominal cramping. Microscopic abnormalities included erythema, edema, bleeding, erosions, and neutrophil invasion.[24]

Autoimmune hepatitis has been reported in a small number of patients treated with ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 therapy.[24] Autoimmune hepatitis presents as an asymptomatic increase in aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and total bilirubin; fatigue and low-grade fevers have been observed.[23] Time of onset for this side effect was variable, ranging from 1 to 23 weeks in patients with metastatic melanoma.[25] Radiographic findings include hepatomegaly, periportal lymphadenopathy, and periportal edema.[23] Hepatic profile should be obtained at baseline and before each cycle of therapy to assure early recognition of any of these deleterious side effects.

To ensure patients receive a timely intervention for these gastrointestinal side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors, nursing care will include assessing for and educating patients and family members on reporting changes in bowel habits and symptoms including blood or mucus in stool, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. While mild gastrointestinal symptoms may be resolved with dietary changes or the administration of loperamide, severe symptoms, including having >7 stools over initial assessment in 1 day, may require withholding the agent and starting corticosteroid therapy.[26]


  Pulmonary Side Effects Top


Immune-mediated pneumonitis is described as a noninfectious inflammation of the lining of the lung with associated interstitial or alveolar infiltrations.[25] This side effect is not as prevalent as colitis or hepatitis, but it is associated with morbidity and mortality and often leads to discontinuation of treatment.

Pulmonary toxicity is uncommon in patients treated with ipilimumab. For patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy, the overall incidence rate of pneumonitis is 9%.[24] Pneumonitis may occur at any point during and after treatment. Reduced lung reserve due to preexisting lung disease and chest radiotherapy may increase the risk of developing pneumonitis.[24] The diagnosis of pneumonitis is based on clinical presentation and radiographic imaging. Clinical signs and symptoms include dyspnea, cough, fatigue, hypoxia, chest pain, and hemoptysis. The severity of symptoms varies among patients and frequently mimics other common respiratory illnesses. Radiographic findings of diffuse infiltrates, lobular nodularity with air trapping, and interstitial fibrosis support the diagnosis. In patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy, microscopic findings include diffuse lymphocytic infiltrates,[27] whereas in limited reports of ipilimumab-induced pneumonitis, histologic findings were described as sarcoid-like granulomatous reactions with macrophages surrounded by inflammation.[28] Nursing care considerations include the assessment of and education of patients and families to report on changes in pulmonary function, including shortness of breath, coughing, chest pain, and fever. In severe cases, corticosteroid or oxygen therapy may be required.[21]


  Dermatological Side Effects Top


The most common cutaneous toxicities include pruritus and maculopapular rash. Cases of immune-mediated cutaneous toxicities include vitiligo, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, Sweet's syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, bullous pemphigoid, and lichen sclerosus. Rash and pruritus occur early and are observed in nearly 50% of all patients treated with ipilimumab as compared to 28%–37% in patients treated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab, respectively.[23] Patients with suspected Stevens–Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis require immediate hospitalization.[29] The offending agent should be discontinued in these instances.

Nursing care of patients with dermatological side effects depends on the nature and severity of the reported symptom. Nurses should assess for and educate patients and families to report any of the aforementioned symptoms. Fragrance-free creams, lukewarm showers, and oatmeal baths may be recommended, in addition to antihistamines to address pruritus.[22] In addition to the sample educational tool provided in this article [Figure 2], other educational materials are available, including Skin Reactions to Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy by the American Society of Clinical Oncology,[30] available at http://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/side-effects/skin-reactions-targeted-therapy-and-immunotherapy. Educational tools for dermatological symptom management may also be provided by organizations and institutions, such as the one found at https://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/patient-education/skin-care during-treatment-targeted-therapies.[31] These may serve as references for patients in their self-management of dermatological toxicities.


  Endocrine-Related Side Effects Top


Immune-mediated endocrine toxicities include hypophysitis (pituitary gland inflammation), thyroiditis, hypothyroidism, and adrenal insufficiency. The incidence of hypophysitis is mostly associated with CTLA-4 blockade. In patients treated with ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab, the incidence of hypophysitis was 11%–17%[32] as compared to <1% in patients treated with PD-1 monotherapy.[33]

The clinical manifestation of hypophysitis includes headaches, dizziness, diplopia, loss of peripheral vision, extreme fatigue, irritability, cold intolerance, nausea, or vomiting.[29] Diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation of hypopituitarism, and radiographic imaging with a pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. In most cases, hypophysitis is associated with hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, or adrenal crisis, which is a potentially life-threatening condition requiring immediate medical attention.[34]

Immune-mediated thyroid dysfunction can present as hyperthyroidism, destructive thyroiditis, or hypothyroidism.[35] The incidence of thyroid disorders is similar for both CTLA-4 blockage and anti-PD-1 monotherapy but increases significantly when combined or in combination.[33] The symptoms of thyroid dysfunction may include palpitations, irritability, fatigue, changes in weight, heat or cold sensitivity, alopecia, or constipation.[25] Thyroid functions test should be obtained at baseline and periodically throughout the treatment.[25] Elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels with low thyroxine triiodothyronine (TTT) is indicative of hypothyroidism whereas a low TSH level and elevated TTT indicate thyroiditis/hyperthyroidism.

Nursing care to guarantee patients receive swift intervention for endocrine-related side effects includes assessing for changes in the aforementioned symptoms as well as changes in mental status, low blood pressure, headaches, atypical bowel habits, and fatigue. Patients and family members must also be taught to recognize these symptoms and to promptly report them. The offending agent may be withheld until the resolution of the symptoms, and in some cases, patients may undergo hormone treatment or corticosteroid therapy or have the agent discontinued.[34] Additional information pertaining to the management of immune-related toxicities is shown in [Table 2].[36]
Table 2: Management of immune related toxicities


Click here to view



  Future Directions of Cancer Immunotherapy Top


The early success of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors and cancer immunotherapies in general has generated a tremendous interest in further developing and exploring these strategies across the oncology disease spectrum. In light of the sometimes extended time period required for observing an antitumor response and need to ensure potential candidates are likely to benefit from a specific type of immunotherapy,[37] the identification of biomarkers that can aid with predicting response and ultimately in helping make informed decisions about selecting patients for treatment is one of the most important future steps in immunotherapy. For example, PDL-1 expression has been correlated with response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapeutic agents in patients,[38],[39] suggesting that higher levels of PDL-1 expression better predict responses to this type of treatment. However, CTLA-4 expression does not help predict response to PD-1/PDL-1 inhibition, which illustrates the potentially high specificity of biomarkers.

While observations, such as the aforementioned, are important first steps in identifying potentially useful predictive biomarkers, there is also a need for additional work in the development of clinical assays that standardize the evaluation of patient samples so that biomarker identification is consistent and valid without requiring substantial additional effort on behalf of patients in providing samples.[37] Oncology nurses need to be up-to-date with respect to biomarker identification for immunotherapies to be able to educate patients on the complexities surrounding the development of a truly personalized therapeutic strategy for their cancer treatment.


  Conclusion Top


Cancer immunotherapy has created a new and exciting avenue for treatment and potentially cure for patients with cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently provided major advances in the care of individuals with a variety of advanced solid tumors, and their ongoing testing in clinical trials creates new hope for patients affected by other types of disease. Oncology nurses are at the forefront of patient care and so must be knowledgeable of the unique treatment, side effect, and patient and family learning and management considerations associated with these agents to ensure the best quality of life and minimization of symptoms in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapies.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Sean Burke, B.S. for her contributions in assisting with identifying manuscripts for this review.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Altekruse SF, et al., editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2013, Based on November 2015 SEER Data Submission, Posted to the SEER. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; April 2016. Available from: http://www.seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 03].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Zeng C, Wen W, Morgans AK, Pao W, Shu XO, Zheng W. Disparities by race, age, and sex in the improvement of survival for major cancers: Results From the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program in the United States, 1990 to 2010. JAMA Oncol 2015;1:88-96.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Patel JD, Krilov L, Adams S, Aghajanian C, Basch E, Brose MS, et al. Clinical cancer advances 2013: Annual report on progress against cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:129-60.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mellman I, Coukos G, Dranoff G. Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature 2011;480:480-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Shih K, Arkenau HT, Infante JR. Clinical impact of checkpoint inhibitors as novel cancer therapies. Drugs 2014;74:1993-2013.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
National Cancer Institute. Biological Therapies for Cancer; 2013. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/types/immunotherapy/bio-therapies-fact-sheet#q1. [Last accessed on 2016 Dec 20].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Cancer Research Institute. Timeline of Progress; 2016. Available from: http://www.cancerresearch.org/our-strategy-impact/timeline-of-progress/timeline-detail. [Last accessed on 2016 Dec 20].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Diamond MS, Kinder M, Matsushita H, Mashayekhi M, Dunn GP, Archambault JM, et al. Type I interferon is selectively required by dendritic cells for immune rejection of tumors. J Exp Med 2011;208:1989-2003.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Fuertes MB, Kacha AK, Kline J, Woo SR, Kranz DM, Murphy KM, et al. Host type I IFN signals are required for antitumor CD8+ T cell responses through CD8{alpha}+ dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2011;208:2005-16.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Palucka K, Banchereau J. Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells. Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12:265-77.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Tian T, Olson S, Whitacre JM, Harding A. The origins of cancer robustness and evolvability. Integr Biol (Camb) 2011;3:17-30.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Melero I, Berman DM, Aznar MA, Korman AJ, Pérez Gracia JL, Haanen J. Evolving synergistic combinations of targeted immunotherapies to combat cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2015;15:457-72.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Chen DS, Mellman I. Oncology meets immunology: The cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity 2013;39:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mullard A. New checkpoint inhibitors ride the immunotherapy tsunami. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2013;12:489-92.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-74.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
American Society of Clinical Oncology. Understanding Immunotherapy; 2017. Available from: http://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/how-cancer-treated/immunotherapy-and-vaccines/understanding-immunotherapy. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 03].  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cell Therapy; 2015. Available from: https://www.lls.org/treatment/types-of-treatment/immunotherapy/chimeric-antigen-receptor-car-t-cell-therapy. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 03].  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
American Society of Clinical Oncology. What are Cancer Vaccines? 2017. Available from: http://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/how-cancer-treated/immunotherapy-and-vaccines/what-are-cancer-vaccines. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 03].  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ledezma B, Heng A. Real-world impact of education: Treating patients with ipilimumab in a community practice setting. Cancer Manag Res 2013;6:5-14.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
National Cancer Institute. Immunotherapy; 2017. Availabe from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/types/immunotherapy#4. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 01].  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Chiou VL, Burotto M. Pseudoprogression and immune-related response in solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:3541-3.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Kannan R, Madden K, Andrews S. Primer on immuno-oncology and immune response. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2014;18:311-7, 326.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hofmann L, Forschner A, Loquai C, Goldinger SM, Zimmer L, Ugurel S, et al. Cutaneous, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine, and renal side-effects of anti-PD-1 therapy. Eur J Cancer 2016;60:190-209.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Howell M, Lee R, Bowyer S, Fusi A, Lorigan P. Optimal management of immune-related toxicities associated with checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2015;88:117-23.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Eigentler TK, Hassel JC, Berking C, Aberle J, Bachmann O, Grünwald V, et al. Diagnosis, monitoring and management of immune-related adverse drug reactions of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2016;45:7-18.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Rizvi NA, Mazières J, Planchard D, Stinchcombe TE, Dy GK, Antonia SJ, et al. Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): A phase 2, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:257-65.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Weber JS, D'Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): A randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:375-84.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Tabchi S, Messier C, Blais N. Immune-mediated respiratory adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors. Curr Opin Oncol 2016;28:269-77.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Fecher LA, Agarwala SS, Hodi FS, Weber JS. Ipilimumab and its toxicities: A multidisciplinary approach. Oncologist 2013;18:733-43.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
American Society of Clinical Oncology. Skin Reactions to Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy; 2017. Availabe from: http://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/side-effects/skin-reactions-targeted-therapy-and-immunotherapy. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 03].  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Barton-Burke M, Ciccolini K, Mekas M, Burke S. Dermatologic reactions to targeted therapy: A focus on epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and nursing care. Nurs Clin N Am 2017; 52:83-113.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Snyder PJ. Causes of Hypopituitarism; 2016. Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/causes-of-hypopituitarism. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 18].  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Joshi MN, Whitelaw BC, Palomar MT, Wu Y, Carroll PV. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hypophysitis and endocrine dysfunction: Clinical review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2016;85:331-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Human Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4) Blocking Monoclonal Antibody Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy; 2012. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/drugsafety/postmarketdrugsafetyinformationforpatientsandproviders/ucm249435.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 03].  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Postow M, Wolchok J. Toxicities Associated with Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy; 2016. Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/toxicities-associated-with-checkpoint-inhibitor-immunotherapy. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 18].  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Weber JS, Postow M, Lao CD, Schadendorf D. Management of adverse events following treatment with anti-programmed death-1 agents. Oncologist 2016;21:1230-40.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Yuan J, Hegde PS, Clynes R, Foukas PG, Harari A, Kleen TO, et al. Novel technologies and emerging biomarkers for personalized cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 2016;4:3.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2443-54.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Taube JM, Klein A, Brahmer JR, Xu H, Pan X, Kim JH, et al. Association of PD-1, PD-1 ligands, and other features of the tumor immune microenvironment with response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:5064-74.  Back to cited text no. 39
    

 
  Authors Top

Jennifer Dine


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 What can independent research for mesothelioma achieve to treat this orphan disease?
Alice Guazzelli,Parisa Meysami,Emyr Bakker,Ezio Bonanni,Constantinos Demonacos,Marija Krstic-Demonacos,Luciano Mutti
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Atezolizumab-Induced Autoimmune Diabetes in a Patient With Metastatic Lung Cancer
Jin Sothornwit,Anakapong Phunmanee,Chatlert Pongchaiyakul
Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2019; 10
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Tn antigen analogues: the synthetic way to “upgrade” an attracting tumour associated carbohydrate antigen (TACA)
Cristina Nativi,Francesco Papi,Stefano Roelens
Chemical Communications. 2019; 55(54): 7729
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Iatrogenic CNS demyelination in the era of modern biologics
Neha Kumar,Hesham Abboud
Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2019; 25(8): 1079
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Kiss and Run: Promoting Effective and Targeted Cellular Uptake of a Drug Delivery Vehicle Composed of an Integrin-Targeting Diketopiperazine Peptidomimetic and a Cell-Penetrating Peptide
Lucia Feni,Sara Parente,Clémence Robert,Silvia Gazzola,Daniela Arosio,Umberto Piarulli,Ines Neundorf
Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Immunoepigenetics Combination Therapies: An Overview of the Role of HDACs in Cancer Immunotherapy
Debarati Banik,Sara Moufarrij,Alejandro Villagra
International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(9): 2241
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Novel Small Molecule Inhibitors of Programmed Cell Death (PD)-1, and its Ligand, PD-L1 in Cancer Immunotherapy: A Review Update of Patent Literature
Spandana R. Kopalli,Tae-Bong Kang,Kwang-Ho Lee,Sushruta Koppula
Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery. 2019; 14(2): 100
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Preclinical Evaluation and Clinical Translation of Magnetite-Based Nanomedicines
Julia Nuzhina,Alexander A. Shtil,Artur Prilepskii,Vladimir V. Vinogradov
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2019; : 101282
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Recruiting monomer for dimer formation: resolving the antagonistic mechanisms of novel immune check point inhibitors against Programmed Death Ligand-1 in cancer immunotherapy
Opeyemi S. Soremekun,Fisayo A. Olotu,Clement Agoni,Mahmoud E. S. Soliman
Molecular Simulation. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Making cold malignant pleural effusions hot: driving novel immunotherapies
Pranav Murthy,Chigozirim N. Ekeke,Kira L. Russell,Samuel C. Butler,Yue Wang,James D. Luketich,Adam C. Soloff,Rajeev Dhupar,Michael T. Lotze
OncoImmunology. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Immunotherapy: enhancing the efficacy of this promising therapeutic in multiple cancers
Jitwadee Inthagard,Joanne Edwards,Antonia K. Roseweir
Clinical Science. 2019; 133(2): 181
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Immunotherapy: last bullet in platinum refractory germ cell testicular cancer
Albert Semaan,Fady GH Haddad,Roland Eid,Hampig Raphael Kourie,Elie Nemr
Future Oncology. 2019; 15(5): 533
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Mistletoe and Immunomodulation: Insights and Implications for Anticancer Therapies
Shiao Li Oei,Anja Thronicke,Friedemann Schad
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2019; 2019: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for and Respond to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Drugs
Alyson Haslam,Vinay Prasad
JAMA Network Open. 2019; 2(5): e192535
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Immunological consequences of chemotherapy: Single drugs, combination therapies and nanoparticle-based treatments
Anusha Pusuluri,Debra Wu,Samir Mitragotri
Journal of Controlled Release. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Peptide-based targeted therapeutics and apoptosis imaging probes for cancer therapy
Sri Murugan Poongkavithai Vadevoo,Smriti Gurung,Fatima Khan,Md. Enamul Haque,Gowri Rangaswamy Gunassekaran,Lianhua Chi,Uttapol Permpoon,Byungheon Lee
Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2019; 42(2): 150
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Surgical Tumor-Derived Personalized Photothermal Vaccine Formulation for Cancer Immunotherapy
Xinyu Ye,Xin Liang,Qian Chen,Qianwei Miao,Xiuli Chen,Xudong Zhang,Lin Mei
ACS Nano. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: The past, the present, and the future
Meng Lu,Yanjun Su
Thoracic Cancer. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Targeting the Interplay between Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal-Transition and the Immune System for Effective Immunotherapy
Rama Soundararajan,Jared Fradette,Jessica Konen,Stacy Moulder,Xiang Zhang,Don Gibbons,Navin Varadarajan,Ignacio Wistuba,Debasish Tripathy,Chantale Bernatchez,Lauren Byers,Jeffrey Chang,Alejandro Contreras,Bora Lim,Edwin Parra,Emily Roarty,Jing Wang,Fei Yang,Michelle Barton,Jeffrey Rosen,Sendurai Mani
Cancers. 2019; 11(5): 714
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Therapeutic vaccines for high-risk HPV-associated diseases
Aleyo Chabeda,Romana J.R. Yanez,Renate Lamprecht,Ann E. Meyers,Edward P. Rybicki,Inga I. Hitzeroth
Papillomavirus Research. 2018; 5: 46
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Development of mRNA vaccines and their prophylactic and therapeutic applications
Kyuri Lee,Minjeong Kim,Yunmi Seo,Hyukjin Lee
Nano Research. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
22 Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Summary
Julie R. Brahmer,Christina Lacchetti,John A. Thompson
Journal of Oncology Practice. 2018; 14(4): 247
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 Checkpoint inhibitors: What gastroenterologists need to know
Monjur Ahmed
World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2018; 24(48): 5433
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Analysis of Vipadenant and Its In Vitro and In Vivo Metabolites via Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Seok-Ho Shin,Min-Ho Park,Jin-Ju Byeon,Byeong Lee,Yuri Park,Nahye Kim,Jangmi Choi,Young Shin
Pharmaceutics. 2018; 10(4): 260
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 Survival Extrapolation in Cancer Immunotherapy: A Validation-Based Case Study
Ash Bullement,Nicholas R. Latimer,Helen Bell Gorrod
Value in Health. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
26 Diagnostik und Therapie von immunvermittelten Nebenwirkungen durch Checkpointinhibitoren in der Intensivmedizin
Y. d’Hargues,J. Prinz,P. Gödel,A. Shimabukuro-Vornhagen,M. Kochanek,B. Böll
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
27 Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
Julie R. Brahmer,Christina Lacchetti,Bryan J. Schneider,Michael B. Atkins,Kelly J. Brassil,Jeffrey M. Caterino,Ian Chau,Marc S. Ernstoff,Jennifer M. Gardner,Pamela Ginex,Sigrun Hallmeyer,Jennifer Holter Chakrabarty,Natasha B. Leighl,Jennifer S. Mammen,David F. McDermott,Aung Naing,Loretta J. Nastoupil,Tanyanika Phillips,Laura D. Porter,Igor Puzanov,Cristina A. Reichner,Bianca D. Santomasso,Carole Seigel,Alexander Spira,Maria E. Suarez-Almazor,Yinghong Wang,Jeffrey S. Weber,Jedd D. Wolchok,John A. Thompson
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2018; 36(17): 1714
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
28 Guillain-Barré-like syndrome during pembrolizumab treatment
Stephanie Ong,James Chapman,Gavin Young,Talal Mansy
Muscle & Nerve. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
29 Data-Driven Methods for Advancing Precision Oncology
Prema Nedungadi,Akshay Iyer,Georg Gutjahr,Jasmine Bhaskar,Asha B. Pillai
Current Pharmacology Reports. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
30 A comprehensive review on the role of co-signaling receptors and Treg homeostasis in autoimmunity and tumor immunity
Prabhakaran Kumar,Palash Bhattacharya,Bellur S. Prabhakar
Journal of Autoimmunity. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
31 Addressing New Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges Associated With a New Age of Cancer Treatment
Jason J. Bischof,Carolyn J. Presley,Jeffrey M. Caterino
Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
32 Immunotherapy Adverse Events, Part 2: The Role of the Primary Care Nurse Practitioner
Fedricker D. Barber
The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
33 Next generation of immune checkpoint therapy in cancer: new developments and challenges
Julian A. Marin-Acevedo,Bhagirathbhai Dholaria,Aixa E. Soyano,Keith L. Knutson,Saranya Chumsri,Yanyan Lou
Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2018; 11(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
34 Characterization of cancer genomic heterogeneity by next-generation sequencing advances precision medicine in cancer treatment
Jialing Zhang,Stephan Stanislaw Späth,Sadie L Marjani,Wengeng Zhang,Xinghua Pan
Precision Clinical Medicine. 2018; 1(1): 29
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
35 Ex Vivo Tumor-on-a-Chip Platforms to Study Intercellular Interactions within the Tumor Microenvironment
Vardhman Kumar,Shyni Varghese
Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2018; : 1801198
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
36 A review and validation of overall survival extrapolation in health technology assessments of cancer immunotherapy by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: how did the initial best estimate compare to trial data subsequently made available?
Ash Bullement,Yang Meng,Miranda Cooper,Dawn Lee,Tara Louise Harding,Chris O’Regan,Raquel Aguiar-Ibanez
Journal of Medical Economics. 2018; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
37 Oncolytic adenovirus: A tool for cancer therapy in combination with other therapeutic approaches
Nasser Hashemi Goradel,Nasir Mohajel,Ziba Veisi Malekshahi,Samira Jahangiri,Masoud Najafi,Bagher Farhood,Keywan Mortezaee,Babak Negahdari,Arash Arashkia
Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
38 Nano-pulse stimulation induces potent immune responses, eradicating local breast cancer while reducing distant metastases
Siqi Guo,Yu Jing,Niculina I. Burcus,Brittany P. Lassiter,Royena Tanaz,Richard Heller,Stephen J. Beebe
International Journal of Cancer. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Defining Immunot...
The Cancer-Immun...
Immunotherapeuti...
Nursing Care and...
Gastrointestinal...
Pulmonary Side E...
Dermatological S...
Endocrine-Relate...
Future Direction...
Conclusion
References
Authors
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3171    
    Printed68    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded712    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 38    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]