Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 317
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 170-175

A prospective study of the relationship between psychological factors and breast cancer


1 Department of Nursing, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2 Graduate Institute of Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine with Western Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan

Date of Submission13-Jul-2015
Date of Acceptance05-Oct-2015
Date of Web Publication25-May-2016

Correspondence Address:
Mei-Ling Yeh
PhD, DMS Professor, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences B515, No. 365, Minde Road Taipei
Taiwan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2347-5625.170223

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Objective: This cross-sectional prospective study aimed to explore the relationship between psychological factors and breast cancer incidence. Methods: The subjects who scheduled to receive mammography screening were recruited from a medical center's outpatient department in Taiwan. Psychological factors used for measurement were stress, anxiety, and depression. Results: A total of 1160 questionnaires were completed, which underwent statistical analysis using independent t-test, Chi-square test, Pearson's correlation, and multiple logistic regression. There were statistically significant differences in the average scores of the two groups with and without breast cancer for psychological factors of anxiety (t = −2.071; P = 0.039), depression (t = −3.035; P = 0.002), and stress (t = −4.087; P < 0.001). The crude odds ratio of the two groups showed that subjects with borderline anxiety were 2.576 times ( P = 0.001) more likely to have breast cancer as compared to subjects with no anxiety. Subjects with depression were 4.078 times (P = 0.03) more likely to have breast cancer as compared to subjects with no depression. Every point added to the average total stress score increased the additional risk of breast cancer by 1.124 times (P < 0.001). Conclusions: After making adjustments on educational factors, the results conclude that psychological factors such as stress, anxiety, and depression can be considered predictors of breast cancer risk. To prevent and control breast cancer in women, the findings suggest that nurses should consider adding emphasis on psychological factors in women's health education.

Keywords: Anxiety, breast cancer, depression, risk factors, stress


How to cite this article:
Lee TY, Yeh ML. A prospective study of the relationship between psychological factors and breast cancer. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2016;3:170-5

How to cite this URL:
Lee TY, Yeh ML. A prospective study of the relationship between psychological factors and breast cancer. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 15];3:170-5. Available from: http://www.apjon.org/text.asp?2016/3/2/170/170223


  Introduction Top


Breast cancer has become the most common type of cancer among women and was responsible for the second highest number of cancer deaths in women in the United States. [1] It is estimated that 232,670 women were diagnosed with and 40,000 women died of breast cancer in 2014. [2] The incidence of breast cancer in women was highest among all other cancer types in Taiwan. [3] It poses a major threat to the health of women worldwide. There are many risk factors for breast cancer. Currently, the recognized high-risk factors include hormonal replacement, genes, age, diet, and ethnicity. [4] Other factors more tentatively elated to breast cancer include psychological factors, [5] smoking, [6] and exercise. [7]

Psychological stress, an emotional factor, might play an important role in the development of breast cancer. [8],[9],[10],[11],[12] Some studies have indicated a link between various psychological factors and an increased risk of developing cancer, although other studies have not. [13],[14] In vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies show that stress-related processes can impact pathways associated to cancer progression, including immunoregulation, angiogenesis, and invasion. [13] A study found that corticotropin-releasing hormone is related to stress or emotions and increases a human's susceptibility to disease and promotes infections, inflammation, or tumors. [15] Depending on this association, some studies further focused on psychological factors in relation to the elevated risk of specific cancer. [16],[17],[18],[19],[20] To demonstrate the relationship between stress and cancer, a population-based sample of 3177 cancer-free adults were followed for 24 years with findings suggesting that major depression was associated with a higher hazard for overall cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.0) and a significant increased hazard for breast cancer (HR: 4.4, 95% CI: 1.08-17.6). [17] A study followed 33,819 newly diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with mean duration of 5.19 years, and the result showed that female MDD patients had higher breast cancer risk. [18] A hospital-based case-control study consisted of 148 breast cancer patients and 148 health controls and found that women with high levels of stress compared to those reporting low stress had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.92 (95% CI: 0.81-4.55) for breast cancer. [19] A study investigated the relations of perceived stress and lifestyle to breast cancer and found perceived stress, when combined with potentially risky lifestyle behaviors, may be a contributing factor to breast cancer. [20] As presented above, psychological factors are known to contribute to breast carcinomas.

In contrast, several studies have found no relationship between psychological factors and breast cancer. Sun et al.[5] conducted an updated meta-analysis of cohort studies to assess the association between depression and risk of breast cancer, and concluded that the evidence was insufficient to support a positive association between depression and breast cancer. Heikkilδ et al. [21] conducted a meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies that included 116,056 men and women aged 17-70 years old who were free from cancer at the baseline study and were followed-up after a median of 12 years. The results revealed that no association was observed between work stress and the risk of breast cancer. Lillberg et al. [22] investigated stress in 10,519 subjects and followed them for 20 years. Their result indicated that stress was not related to breast cancer, although the report did not provide data on the validity of the measurement tools used. Kroenke et al. [23] conducted a study of 69,886 nonprofessional patient caregivers who experienced high degrees of stress and followed them for 4-8 years. Among these women, only 1700 were diagnosed with breast cancer; leading the researchers to conclude that stress did not increase the risk of breast cancer in these women.

Butow et al.[8] reviewed 16 studies focusing on the relationship between stress events and breast cancer incidence, and not only concluded the individual studies had methodological limitations, but also suggested future study should apply theoretical models, develop a clear hypothesis, use a prospective study design, and clearly define the control group to enhance the validity of the results. Since available research on the issue face a number of methodological difficulties, [17] this study planned to address some methodological issues. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, most of the existing findings from the investigation of relationships between psychological factors and breast cancer were obtained from Western societies. This is problematic as Asian and Western cultures differ notably in cancer incidence and lifestyle. [24] Therefore, this study aimed to explore the relationship between psychological factors and breast cancer incidence in patients who were going to receive mammography screening.


  Methods Top


Study design and sample

A prospective cross-sectional research design was used in this study. All subjects who were going to receive mammography screening were recruited from outpatient departments in a 1820-bed medical center in Taiwan. A total of 1326 questionnaires were distributed and 1215 were returned. Of the 1215 questionnaires received, 55 were invalid due to missing data and 1160 (95.3%) were valid to analyze. Until diagnosis was assured, the subjects were divided into a breast cancer group (n = 54) and a nonbreast cancer group (n = 1106) according to the results of the mammography.

Measures

Demographic characteristics that were measured included age, educational level, marital status, height, weight, employment status, family income, habits of smoking, drinking, and exercise, medical history, reasons for examination, age at menarche, age at menopause, age of first maternity, postmenopausal hormone use, and family history of breast cancer.

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) with a reliability Cronbach's α of 0.82 was used to measure general, life, and work-related stress perception. [25] Questions 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10 were reverse questions on a 4-point scale with higher scores representing greater stress. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) screens for symptoms of anxiety and depression combined. [26] The HADS consists of 7 questions measuring anxiety (HAD-A) and 7 questions measuring depression (HAD-D). The scale primarily uses a 4-point Likert scale (0-3 points). The result score of HAD-A or HAD-D questionnaire can range from 0 to 21, with a higher score representing greater anxiety or depression. A HAD-A or HAD-D score within the range of 0-7 points represents no anxiety or depression; a score within 8-10 points represents borderline anxiety or borderline depression, and a score within 11-21 points represents anxiety or depression. The Cronbach's α was 0.74 and 0.70 for HAD-A and HAD-D, respectively.

Procedures and statistical analysis

First, ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the study hospital (TSGHIRB: 097-05-008). Second, subjects who were waited to have a mammography examination in the outpatient department and met inclusion criteria were invited to participant this study. All subjects were made aware that personal data collected for the study would remain confidential. Subjects had the right to withdraw themselves from the study at any time. Third, on the day prior to mammography, researchers explained the study protocol and asked subjects to complete the demographic sheet, PSS, and HADS. Grouping subjects into breast cancer or not was based on the result of pathological biopsy. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) version 18.0. A level of significance of 5% was used to confirm the validity of the data. Student's t-test, χ2 test, OR, and multiple logistic regression were examined.


  Results Top


[Table 1] summarizes the demographic characteristics of the two groups. Based on the statistical results of the demographic data, the two groups had statistically significant differences in education level (t = 13.818; P = 0.017), but differences between other variables were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). [Table 2] summarizes the results of the t-test on psychological factors in subjects with and without breast cancer. Statistically significant differences were found in the average scores of the two groups for psychological factors of anxiety (t = -2.071; P = 0.039), depression (t = -3.035; P = 0.002), and stress (t = -4.087; P < 0.001). As shown in [Table 3], the majority of subjects showed no anxiety (n = 744, 64.1%), followed by borderline anxiety (n = 225, 22%), and anxiety (n = 161, 13.9%). In addition, the majority of subjects showed no depression (n = 985, 85%), followed by borderline depression (n = 142, 12.2%), and depression (n = 32, 2.8%). There was a significant group difference in the anxiety level (χ2 = 14.778; P < 0.01) and the depression level (χ2 = 11.089; P < 0.01).
Table 1: Demographic characteristics for the two groups

Click here to view
Table 2: Psychological factors in women with/without breast cancer

Click here to view
Table 3: Psychological factors in women with/without breast cancer

Click here to view


[Table 4] summarizes the results of the crude OR of the two groups. Subjects with borderline anxiety were 3.099 times (P < 0.001) more likely to have breast cancer as compared to subjects with no anxiety. Subjects with anxiety were 2.173 times (P = 0.043) more likely to have breast cancer as compared to subjects with no anxiety. Subjects with borderline depression were 1.840 times (P = 0.092) more likely to have breast cancer as compared to subjects with no depression. Subjects with depression were 4.497 times (P = 0.001) more likely to have breast cancer as compared to subjects with no depression. Every point added to the average total stress score increased the additional risk of breast cancer by 1.124 times (P < 0.001). [Table 5] shows the results of the goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model. The model included anxiety, depression, and stress factors. The overall goodness-of-fittest for psychological factors showed a statistical significance (χ2 = 25.868, P < 0.001).
Table 4: Crude OR and 95% CI for psychological factors (n = 1160)

Click here to view
Table 5: Results of multiple logistic regression models (n = 1160)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Psychological factors on breast cancer etiology are concerned. In this study, the same tools were used as with Montazeria et al., [27] but the average scores for the anxiety levels and depression levels were twice as high as compared to the above-mentioned study. These differences could be due to the fact that subjects in the previous study by Montazeria et al.[27] suspected that they had breast cancer before diagnosis. Alternatively, the higher scores in the previous study might indicate that Iranian women were experiencing higher levels of anxiety and depression than Taiwanese women. The average age of subjects who developed breast cancer in our study was 47.2 years, which was much younger than the women in the study by Montazeria et al.[27]

This study showed that breast cancer incidence might be related to psychological factors such as anxiety or depression before educational levels were adjusted, and the results were similar to the some prospective studies. [17],[28] However, this study's results were different from the study that had no significant association between a cancer outcome and emotional suppression in a large mammography screened population. [29] The difference may be related to the lifestyle and culture issue between Asian and Western women [24] and the fact that breast cancer was more prevalent in women aged 40-49 years in Taiwan; and in contrast, invasive breast cancer was more prevalent in women aged 60-69 in the United States based on the statistical data from 1975 to 2003. [30] Women in Taiwan face rapidly changing social patterns, play multiple roles, and have a high level of emotional distress, which may have contributed the relationship among the risks of breast cancer such as stress, anxiety, and depression, as seen in the results of this study.

The results of this study indicate that whether education level is adjusted or not, stress could be a predictor of breast cancer incidence; and it is the most significant factor among the three psychological factors that correlated with the risk of breast cancer. Every point added to the stress score would increase crude risk 1.124 times. Some studies have suggested that stress increases the risk of breast cancer, [19],[20],[31] but other studies have not found this. [21],[22] Unlike this study, Kroenke et al.[23] suggested that stress is not related to breast cancer incidence. Their study recruited 69,886 nonprofessional patient caregivers, with a high degree of pressure, to measure their stress from caring for elderly people or children and their long working hours. After 4-8 years of continued follow-up, 1700 were diagnosed with breast cancer. Their result concluded that stress did not increase the risk of breast cancer.

This study showed that anxiety, depression, and stress might tentatively be related to breast cancer incidence. These findings suggest that nurses should pay more attention to the mental health of women and provide their female patients, especially those with lower education levels, with more breast cancer prevention information such as more breast cancer prevention information and psychosocial interventions with a well-focused stress reduction and coping skills. Available literature have only a few reports on prospective studies exploring the relationship between breast cancer and psychological factors. This study had some valuable findings, but it might have some unavoidable interference of emotional factors, while awaiting mammograms and the lower proportion of anxiety level participants within the cancer group that goes to the bias that borderline anxiety group were at significantly higher risk, but the group who met a diagnostic score were at a lower statistically significantly increased risk. To reduce this potential bias, future research could investigate subjects undergoing annual regular screening in the community. To increase the generalizability of the results of this study, it is suggested that future studies should conduct investigations nationwide to build up a database for comprehensive analyses.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast Cancer; 2014. Available from: target="_blank" href="http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/". [Last accessed on 2015 May 27].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer; 2014a. Available from: target="_blank" href="http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/breast". [Last accessed on 2015 May 27].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ministry of Health and Welfare (Taiwan). 2013 Statistical Results on Causes of Death in Taiwan; 2014. Available from: target="_blank" href="http://www.mohw.gov.tw/EN/Ministry/DM1_P.aspx?f_list_no=378&fod_list_no=4999&doc_no=46611". [Last accessed on 2015 May 27].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Towards an integrated model for breast cancer etiology: The lifelong interplay of genes, lifestyle, and hormones. Breast Cancer Res 2004;6:213-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sun HL, Dong XX, Cong YJ, Gan Y, Deng J, Cao SY, et al. Depression and the risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:3233-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Catsburg C, Miller AB, Rohan TE. Active cigarette smoking and risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2015;136:2204-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Friedenreich CM, MacLaughlin S, Neilson HK, Stanczyk FZ, Yasui Y, Duha A, et al. Study design and methods for the Breast Cancer and Exercise Trial in Alberta (BETA). BMC Cancer 2014;14:919.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Butow PN, Hiller JE, Price MA, Thackway SV, Kricker A, Tennant CC. Epidemiological evidence for a relationship between life events, coping style, and personality factors in the development of breast cancer. J Psychosom Res 2000;49:169-81.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hulbert-Williams N, Neal R, Morrison V, Hood K, Wilkinson C. Anxiety, depression and quality of life after cancer diagnosis: What psychosocial variables best predict how patients adjust? Psychooncology 2012;21:857-67.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Jezierska-Drutel A, Rosenzweig SA, Neumann CA. Role of oxidative stress and the microenvironment in breast cancer development and progression. Adv Cancer Res 2013;119:107-25.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Helgesson O, Cabrera C, Lapidus L, Bengtsson C, Lissner L. Self-reported stress levels predict subsequent breast cancer in a cohort of Swedish women. Eur J Cancer Prev 2003;12:377-81.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Nielsen NR, Zhang ZF, Kristensen TS, Netterstrøm B, Schnohr P, Grønbaek M. Self reported stress and risk of breast cancer: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2005;331:548.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lutgendorf SK, Sood AK, Antoni MH. Host factors and cancer progression: Biobehavioral signaling pathways and interventions. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4094-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
National Cancer Institute. Psychological Stress and Cancer; 2014b. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/stress. [Last accessed on 2015 May 27].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ciocca DR, Puy LA, Fasoli LC, Tello O, Aznar JC, Gago FE, et al. Corticotropin-releasing hormone, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, growth hormone-releasing hormone, and somatostatin-like immunoreactivities in biopsies from breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1990;15:175-84.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Chen YH, Lin HC. Increased risk of cancer subsequent to severe depression - A nationwide population-based study. J Affect Disord 2011;131:200-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gross AL, Gallo JJ, Eaton WW. Depression and cancer risk: 24 years of follow-up of the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area sample. Cancer Causes Control 2010;21:191-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wu YT. Higher Cancer Risk among Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Taiwan. Unpublished thesis, Department of Public Health, Tsu-Gi University; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Wong LJ. A Case-control Study of Breast Cancer Occurrence, Stress and its Related Risk Factors. Unpublished Thesis, Department of Public Health, Chung-Shan Medical University; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Wang L, Liao WC, Tsai CJ, Wang LR, Mao IF, Chen CC, et al. The effects of perceived stress and life style leading to breast cancer. Women Health 2013;53:20-40.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Heikkilä K, Nyberg ST, Theorell T, Fransson EI, Alfredsson L, Bjorner JB, et al. Work stress and risk of cancer: Meta-analysis of 5700 incident cancer events in 116,000 European men and women. BMJ 2013;346:f165.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lillberg K, Verkasalo PK, Kaprio J, Teppo L, Helenius H, Koskenvuo M. Stress of daily activities and risk of breast cancer: A prospective cohort study in Finland. Int J Cancer 2001;91:888-93.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kroenke CH, Hankinson SE, Schernhammer ES, Colditz GA, Kawachi I, Holmes MD. Caregiving stress, endogenous sex steroid hormone levels, and breast cancer incidence. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:1019-27.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Herszényi L, Tulassay Z. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal and liver tumors. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2010;14: 249-58.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstrin R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983;34:285-96.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Zigmond AS, Snaith PR. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361-70.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Montazeria A, Harirchi I, Vahdami M, Khaleghi F, Jarvandi S, Ebrahimi M, et al. Anxiety and depression in Iranian breast cancer patients before and after diagnosis. Eur J Cancer Care 2000;9:151-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Jacobs JR, Bovasso GB. Early and chronic stress and their relation to breast cancer. Psychol Med 2000;30:669-78.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
O`Donell MC, Fisher R, Irvine K, Rickard M, McConaghy N. Emotional suppression: Can it predict cancer outcome in woman with suspicious screening mammograms? Psychol Med 2000;30:1079-88.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Howe HL, Wu X, Ries LA, Cokkinides V, Ahmed F, Jemal A, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2003, featuring cancer among U.S. Hispanic/Latino populations. Cancer 2006;107:1711-42.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Hosseinzadeh M, Eivazi Z, Mahdavi N, Aghajari P, Vahidi M, Fateh A, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer in Iranian women: A hospital-based case-control study in Tabriz, Iran. J Breast Cancer 2014;17:236-43.  Back to cited text no. 31
    

 
  Authors Top


Mei-Ling Yeh



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Authors
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3160    
    Printed62    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded313    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]